DOES ARTICLE 2 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS PRESCRIBE AN ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY? THE IMPACT OF RECENT PRACTICE OF EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME190205042IKeywords:
right to life, ECHR, ECtHR, death penalty, Protocol 6 and 13Abstract
In paragraph 1 of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the imposition of the death penalty is permitted, as a departure from the right to life. In the last decades there has been a tendency for the absolute abolition of the death penalty, in times of war and peace. As a result of this effort, almost all European countries abolished the death penalty. In addition, the Council of Europe adopted Protocol 6 and Protocol 13, which completely abolished the death penalty. The European Court also, in its practice, using the principle of "convention as a living instrument", has changed its approach to the scope of the ban on the application of the death penalty. The authors deal with a critical interpretation of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, trying to answer the question, of whether there has been an abrogation of the provision of paragraph 1 of Article 2, so that according to that provision, there is an absolute ban on the application of the death penalty in the Council of Europe member states.
References
Al Nashiri v Poland, app. no. 28761/11;
Al-Saadon and Mufdhi v the UK, app. no. 61498/08,
Al-Saadon and Mufdhi v the UK, app. no. 61498/08;
Ancel, M, (1962) Capital Punishment, New York, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs;
Bader and Kanbor, app. no. 13284/04;
Bahaddar v. the Netherlands, app. no 25894/94;
Barno Saidova v. Tajikistan, Communication No. 964/2001;
Behrmann, C, Yorke, J, (2013) The European Union and abolition of the death penalty, Pace International Law Review Online Companion, 4(1), 1-78;
Capital Punishment, UN General Assemby A/RES/32/61 (1977);
Chisanga v Zambia, Communication No. 1132/2002;
Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee: Kenya, UN document CCPR/CO/83/KEN, (2005);
Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee: Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, UN document CCPR/C/79/Add.101, (1998);
Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee: Peru, UN document CCPR/C/79/Add.67, (1996);
Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee: Sudan, UN document CCPR/C/79/Add.85; (1997);
Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee: Uganda, UN document CCPR/CO/80/UGA, (2003);
Concluding Observations: Guatemala, UN document CCPR/CO/72/GTM, (2001);
Concluding Observations: Iran, UN document CCPR/C/79/Add.25, (1993);
Concluding Observations: Thailand, UN document CCPR/CO/84/THA, (2005);
Demir v Turkey, app. no. 55373/00 (dec.),
Einhorn v France, app. no. 71555/01 (dec.);
General comment No. 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life, (CCPR/C/GC/36), (2018);
Harris, D, O'Boyle, M, Bates, E, Buckley, C, (2014) Law on the European Convention of Human Rights, Oxford University Press;
Heyns C, Probert, T, (2015) The right to life and the progressive abolition of the death penalty, in: Moving Away from the Death Penalty: Arguments, Trends and Perspectives, 214-227.
Hilaire, Constantine and Benjamin et al. v. Trinidad and Tobago, case 12.269;
Ismaili v. Germany (dec.), app. no. 58128/00;
Luboto v Zambia, Communication No. 390/1990;
Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], app. nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99;
Maryam Khalilova v. Tajikistan, Communication No. 973/2001;
Ocalan v Turkey, app. no. 46221/99;
Pratt and Morgan v Jamaica, Communication No. 210/1986;
Pretty v. The United Kingdom, app. no. 2346/02;
Reid v. Jamaica, Communication No. 250/1987;
Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, E/CN.4/1999/39, (1999);
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, E/CN.4/1997/60, 24. (1996);
Implementation of the safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty, Resolution 1989/64, The Economic and Social Council, (1989);
Rodley, N, (2015) The death penalty as a human rights issue, in: Moving Away from the Death Penalty: Arguments, Trends and Perspectives, 204-214;
Rrapo v Albania, app. no. 58555/10;
S.R. v. Sweden (dec.), app. no. 62806/00;
Safarmo Kurbanova v. Tajikistan, Communication No. 1096/2002;
Soering v. the United Kingdom, app. no. 14038/88;
Soering v. the United Kingdom, app. no. app. no. 14038/88;
The Question of the Death Penalty, UN Commission on Human Rights, Human Rights Resolution 2005/59, E/CN.4/RES/2005/59, (2005);
CCPR General Comment No. 6: Article 6 (Right to Life), UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), 30 April 1982;
