УТИЦАЈ ЕКОЛОШКИХ ПОРЕЗА НА СМАЊЕЊЕ ПОТРОШЊЕ ПЛАСТИЧНИХ КЕСА У РЕПУБЛИЦИ СРБИЈИ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME220529048DKljučne reči:
пластичне кесе, накнада, еколошка свест, економски инструментиApstrakt
Проблем који пластичне кесе представљају по животну средину је један од значајнијих еколошких проблема. Овом проблему се на територији Републике Србије не придаје довољно пажње, а нарочито недостају научна истраживања на ову тему. Поред ублажавања наведеног проблема, циљ овог рада је идентификовање основних фактора који утичу на смањење потрошње лаких (једнократних) пластичних кеса применом екплоративне факторске анализе. Спроведеном анализом је утврђено да на промену понашања потрошача на територији Републике Србије у односу на потрошњу пластичних кеса позитиван утицај имају развој еколошке свести, достуност алтернатива, друштвене норме, као и економски инструменти који би могли да буду имплементирани у будућности.Reference
Asari, M., Sato, N., Sakai, S. (2008). Plastic shopping bag waste from the quantity quality viewpoints: Present status and vision. Waste Management Research, 19, 187–193.
Convery, F., McDonnell, S., Ferreira, S. (2007). The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bag levy. Environmental & Resource Economics, 38, 1–11.
Dias Soares, C. A., (2011). The design features of environmental taxes (PhD Dissertation). Retrived from http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/
Dikgang, J., Visser, M. (2012). Behavioral response to plastic bag legislation in Botswana. South African Journal of Economics, 80, 123–133.
Earth Policy Institute. Plastic bag regulations worldwide. 2014.
Ekins, P. (1999). European environmental taxes and charges: Recent experience, issues and trends. Ecological Economics, 31, 39–62.
Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A., Garling, T. (2008). The Relationships between Awareness of Consequences, Environmental Concern, and Value Orientations. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 28, 1–9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvp.2007.08.004
Hasson, R., Leiman, A., Visser, M. (2007). The economics of plastic bag legislation in South Africa. South African Journal of Economics. 75, 66–83.
Hoang, T. B. T. (2016). Factors affecting the relationship between Vietnamese consumers’ green consumption intentions and behaviors (PhD Dissertation).
Hoang, T. H., Huynh, T. T. Q., Huynh, T. N. (2018). Factors affecting green consumption behavior of consumers in Hue city. Hue University Journal of Science. 127(5A), 199–212.
International Institute for Labour Studies. World of Work Report, 2009.
Lee, C. J., Lim, S. Y. (2020). Impact of Environmental Concern on Image of Internal GSCM Practices and Consumer Purchasing Behavior. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.241.
Luong, T. B. V. (2013). Assessment of the impact of the environmental protection tax policy on the use of plastic bags in Hanoi (Master Thesis).
Mogomotsi, P., Goemeone M., Nametso, P. (2018). Plastic bag usage in a taxed environment: Investigation on the deterrent nature of plastic levy in Maun, Botswana. Waste Management & Research, 37(1), 20–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X18801495.
Muralidharan, S., Sheehan, K. (2016). “Tax” and “Fee” message frames as inhibitors of plastic bag usage among shoppers: A social marketing application of the theory of planned behavior. Social Marketing Quarterly, 22, 200–217.
Pilić, B. (2020, January 4). Biorazgradive kese na tržištu u Srbiji nisu biorazgradive. U Evropi su zabranjene. Nedeljnik. https://www.nedeljnik.rs/biorazgradive-kese-na-trzistu-u-srbiji-nisu-biorazgradive-u-evropi-su-zabranjene/
Schuyler, Q., Hardesty, B. D., Lawson, T., Opie, K., Wilcox, C. Economic incentives reduce plasic inputs to the ocean. Marine Policy, 96, 250-255.
Scott, M. S., Gerald, S. A. (2005). Fundamentals of Marketing Research. London, London: SAGE.
Smithers, R. (2020). England’s Plastic Bag Usage Drops 85% since 5p Charge Introduced. Retrieved November 30, 2020 from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jul/30/use-ofplastic-bags-in-england-drops-by-59-in-a-year.
Stigler, G.J. (1966). The theory of Price. New York, NY:Macmillan.
Stojanović, M. (2016). Efikasnos poreza u rešavanj ekoloških problema (PhD Dissertation). Retrieved from https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/8422
Stojanović, M. (2017). Ekološke naknade kao deo sistema ekoloških poreza u Republici Srbiji. Ekonomski signali, 12 (1), 41-54.
Thomas, G. O., Sautkina E., Poortinga, W., Wolstenholme, E., Whitmarsh, L. (2019). The English Plastic Bag Charge Changed Behaviour and Increased Suupport for Other Charges to Reduce Plastic Waste. Environmental Psychology, 10:266. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00266.
Tong, H.L., Duong, T. H.M. (2021). The Impact of Environmental Protection Tax on Plastic Bag Use: A Case Study of Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 213-221.
Van, L., Norhadilah A. H., Md. Fauzi, A., Ahmad, N. A. A., Rumaizah, R., Puteri, F., Muhamad T. Factors of Single Use Plastic Reduction Behavioral Intention. Emerging Science Journal, 5(3), 269-278.
Vince, J., Hardesty, D. (2017). Plastic pollution challenges in marine and coastal environments: from local to global governance. Restoration Ecology, 25(1) ,123-128.
Vu, A. D., Nguyen, T. H., Nguyen, N. A. (2012). Test the model of factors affecting green consumption behavior. Vietnam Economic Review, 7(195), 30–52.
Wilts, H., Schinkel, J., Feder, L. (2020). Prevention of lastic waste in production and consumption by multi-actor partnerships. Bonn, Bonn:Prevent Waste Aliance.
Zakon o naknadama za korišćenje javnih dobara, Službeni Glasnik RS br. 95/2018, 49/2019, 86/2019, usklađeni din. izn., 156/2020 – usklađeni din. izn. i 15/2021 – dop. usklađeni din. izn.
