ТЕОРИЈА АКТЕР-МРЕЖЕ И ПИТАЊЕ МОЋИ: ПРЕИСПИТИВАЊЕ АГЕНСНОСТИ И СТРУКТУРЕ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME250305005MKljučne reči:
Теорија актер-мреже, Агенција, Социотехнички системи, Односи моћи, Бруно ЛатурApstrakt
Оспоравајући традиционалну поделу између структуре и агенсности, теорија актер-мреже (АНТ) је довела до значајних промена у друштвеним наукама. Осмишљена од стране Бруна Латура, Мишела Калона и Џона Лоа, АНТ инсистира на томе да и људски и нељудски ентитети активно обликују друштвену реалност кроз међусобно повезане мреже. Смрт Бруна Латура, једног од најзначанијих представника АНТ-а, 2022. године, подстакла је критичко преиспитивање наслеђа АНТ-а и њене применљивости на савремене социотехничке трансформације. Овај рад прати еволуцију АНТ-а, истичући њене теоријске основе и методолошке импликације. Анализирамо допринос АНТ-а савременим студијама науке, технологије и друштвене организације, истовремено разматрајући критике које се односе на њен епистемолошки релативизам и недостатак фокуса на динамику моћи. Такође, разматрамо релевантност АНТ-а у објашњавању флуидних интеракција између хетерогених актера, као и ограниченост у анализи системских неједнакости. На послетку, заступамо нијансирану примену AHT-а која интегрише увиде из критичких друштвених теорија, док истовремено задржава своју хеуристичку вредност у проучавању сложених мрежа.
Reference
Akrich, M. (1992). The description of technical objects. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Birešev, A. (2012). Politička ekologija Bruna Latura [The political ecology of Bruno Latour]. Filozofija i društvo, 23(1), 112–125.
Butler, J. (2010). Performing agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147–161.
Callon, M. (1979). L’État face à l’innovation technique: le cas du véhicule électrique. Revue française de science politique, 29(3), 426–447.
Callon, M. (1986a). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Callon, M. (1986b). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In M. Callon, J. Law, & A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 19–34). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Callon, M. (1998). The laws of the markets. In M. Callon (Ed.), The laws of the markets (pp. 1–57). Oxford: Blackwell.
Callon, M. (2006a). Les réseaux sociaux à l’aune de la théorie de l’acteur-réseau: Entretien avec Michel Ferrary. Sociologies pratiques, 2(13), 37–44.
Callon, M. (2006b). Sociologie de l’acteur-réseau. In B. Latour, M. Akrich, & M. Callon (Eds.), Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs (pp. 63–101). Paris: École des Mines.
Callon, M. (2008). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets?: On the performativity of economics (pp. 311–357). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology (pp. 277–304). London: Routledge.
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1992). Don’t throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearley. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 343–368). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2006). Le grand Léviathan s’apprivoise-t-il? Dans B. Latour, M. Akrich et M. Callon (dir.), Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs (pp. 11–32). Paris: École des Mines.
Callon, M., Laredo, P., & Mustar, P. (1997). The strategic management of research and technology: Evaluation of programs. Paris: Economica International.
Collin, P. M., Livian, Y. F., & Thivant, E. (2016). Michel Callon et Bruno Latour: La théorie de l’acteur-réseau. In T. Burger-Helmchen (Ed.), Les grands auteurs en management de l’innovation et de la créativité (pp. 157–178). Caen: EMS Éditions.
Collins, H. M., & Yearley, S. (1992). Epistemological chicken. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 301–326). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Cresswell, K. M., Worth, A., & Sheikh, A. (2010). Actor-network theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10(67). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-67
Crocker, S. (2021). “As soon as we are two there is a medium”: Michel Serres’ philosophy of relations. Media Theory, 5(1), 186–200.
Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York, NY: Holt.
Dubois, M. (2007). La construction métaphorique du collectif: dimensions implicites du prêt-à-penser constructiviste et de la théorie de l’acteur-réseau. L’Année sociologique, 57(1), 127–150.
Farías, I., Blok, A., & Roberts, C. (2020). Actor-network theory as a companion: An inquiry into intellectual practices. In The Routledge companion to actor-network theory (pp. xx–xxxv). New York, NY: Routledge.
Filipović, B. (2012). Bruno Latour i teorija aktera-mreže [Bruno Latour and Actor-Network Theory]. Filozofija i društvo, 23(1), 129–149.
Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Oxford: Polity Press.
Guggenheim, M., & Potthast, M. (2011). Symmetrical twins: On the relationship between actor-network theory and the sociology of critical capacities. Goldsmiths Research (online).
Janković, S. (2023). Pierre Bourdieu et Bruno Latour [Pierre Bourdieu and Bruno Latour]. In I. Mladenović, Z. Zarić, & M. Urošević (Eds.), Pjer Burdije – radikalna misao i praxis [Pierre Bourdieu – Radical Thought and Praxis] (pp. 474–506). Beograd: IFDT.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369–381.
Latour, B. (1998). To modernize or to ecologize? That’s the question. In N. Castree & B. Willems-Braun (Eds.), Remaking reality: Nature at the millennium (pp. 221–242). London and New York: Routledge.
Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 14–25). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. (2006). Changer de société, refaire de la sociologie. Paris: La Découverte.
Latour, B. (2010). An inquiry into modes of existence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2018). Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Latour, B., Akrich, M., & Callon, M. (2006). Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs. Paris: École des Mines.
Law, J. (1986). On the methods of long-distance control: Vessels, navigation, and the Portuguese route to India. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 234–263). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.
Law, J. (2009). Actor-network theory and material semiotics. In B. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Oxford: Blackwell.
Law, J., & Hassard, J. (Eds.). (1999). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.
McGee, K. (2014). Bruno Latour: The normativity of networks. London: Routledge.
Mladenović, I. (2025). Beyond the network: A critical inquiry into the limits of the actor-network theory. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA, LXXII(1), 247–268.
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Muniesa, F. (2015). Actor-network theory. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 80–84). Oxford: Elsevier.
Munro, R. (2009). Actor-network theory. In S. R. Clegg & M. Haugaard (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of power (pp. 125–139). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Petrov, A. (2015). Bruno Latour. Beograd: FMK.
Schinkel, W. (2007). Sociological discourse of the relational: The cases of Bourdieu and Latour. The Sociological Review, 55(4), 707–729.
Serres, M. (2007). The parasite. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Spasić, I. (2007). Bruno Latour, akteri-mreže i kritika kritičke sociologije [Bruno Latour, actor-networks and the critique of critical sociology]. Filozofija i društvo, 18(2), 43–72.
Whittle, A., & Spicer, A. (2008). Is actor-network theory a critique? A pragmatic sociology of translation. Organization Studies, 29(4), 611–629.
