СТАВОВИ ПРЕМА ВЕШТАЧКОЈ ИНТЕЛИГЕНЦИЈИ И РОДНЕ РАЗЛИКЕ МЕЂУ ШПАНСКИМ МЛАДИМ ОДРАСЛИМ ОСОБАМА
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME260131027GKljučne reči:
вештачка интелигенција, ставови, мерење, пол, млади, универзитетApstrakt
Нове технологије трансформишу животне стилове, интеракције и методе учења младих људи. Међу овим новим информационо-комуникационим технологијама, платформе вештачке интелигенције (ВИ) недавно су доживеле значајан бум. Важност општих ставова према ВИ у скорије време је испитана како би се разумело како и зашто се она користи. Четворостепена скала ставова према ВИ (AIAS) недавно је уведена да би се мерили ставови опште јавности према ВИ. Ова студија има за циљ да испита ставове према ВИ међу студентима у Шпанији и да анализира постојање родне раулике у ставовима према скали AIAS-4. Методе: Коришћен је cross-sectional дизајн применом самопријављивачког упитника на узору од 407 студената (63,1% жена; просечна старост = 21,93 године). Студенти основних студија били су уписани на десет високошколских установа у Андалузији, Шпанија, и попунили су онлајн упитник у пролеће 2025. године. Резултати: Истраживање је обезбедило психометричку валидацију AIAS-4 у узорку шпанских студената основних студија, пружајући описне информације о ставовима према вештачкој интелигенцији које могу информисати дизајн програма за промоцију позитивне употребе и одвраћање од ризичних и девијантних понашања. Анализе инваријантности показале су родно инваријантну структуру на конфигурационом и метричком нивоу, без разлика у резултујућем фактору или факторским оптерећењима индикатора. Уочене су разлике на скаларном и строгом нивоу, што је резултирало разликама и у интерцептима и у резидуалима. Дакле, пристрасност у мерењу може објаснити зашто су жене пријавиле највише скептичних ставова према ВИ, а посебно забринутости да ће ВИ побољшати наше животе. Дискусија: Треба дизајнирати родно осетљиве инструменте како би се спречила пристрасност у мерењу. Ово истраживање је нагласило потребу за ефикасним интервенцијама за неговање позитивних ставова према ВИ и подстицање критичке и етичке употребе међу студентима и студенткињама високог образовања.
Reference
Alam, A. (2023). Developing a curriculum for ethical and responsible AI: A university course on safety, fairness, privacy, and ethics to prepare next generation of AI professionals. In Intelligent communication technologies and virtual mobile networks (pp. 879-894). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Cordero Monzón, M. A. (2025). Gestión ética y seguridad en el uso de la inteligencia artificial por estudiantes universitarios. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo, 16(31), e968. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v16i31.2623
Cedeño López, E. S., Alejandro, C. A., Cuecuecha Sánchez, L. A., & Vélez Luna, A. A. (2024). Inteligencia artificial ética en la educación universitaria: enfrentando desafíos y explorando oportunidades para la inclusión educativa. Reincisol, 3(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.59282/reincisol.V3(6)1-16
Chan, S., Pataranutaporn, P., Suri, A., Zulfikar, W., Maes, P., & Loftus, E. F. (2024). Conversational AI powered by large language models amplifies false memories in witness interviews. arXiv, 2408.04681. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.04681
Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology Acceptance Model: TAM. In M. N. Al-Suqri, & A. S. Al-Aufi (Eds.), Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption (pp. 205-219). IGI Global.
De Freitas, J., Agarwal, S., Schmitt, B., & Haslam, N. (2023). Psychological factors underlying attitudes toward AI tools. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(11), 1845-1854. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01734-2
Fiok, K., Farahani, F. V., Karwowski, W., & Ahram, T. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence for education and training. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 19(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/15485129211028651
Francis, N. J., Jones, S., & Smith, D. P. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Balancing innovation and integrity. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 81, 14048. https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048
Grassini, S. (2023). Development and validation of the AI attitude scale (AIAS-4): a brief measure of general attitude toward artificial intelligence. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1191628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191628
Güven, D., Kazancı, E. G., Ören, A., Sever, L., & Ünlü, P. (2024). The Knowledge of Students at Bursa Faculty of Medicine towards Artificial Intelligence: A Survey Study. Journal of Bursa Faculty of Medicine, 2(1), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.61678/bursamed.1390634
Hoanca, B., & Mock, K. J. (2020). Artificial intelligence-based cybercrime. In Encyclopedia of criminal activities and the deep web (pp. 36-51). IGI Global.
Kamila, M. K., & Jasrotia, S. S. (2025). Ethical issues in the development of artificial intelligence: recognizing the risks. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 41(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2023-0107
Kieslich, K., Lünich, M., & Marcinkowski, F. (2021). The threats of artificial intelligence scale (TAI) development, measurement and test over three application domains. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(7), 1563-1577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00734-w
Lim, S., & Shim, H. (2022). No secrets between the two of us: Privacy concerns over using AI agents. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 16(4), Article 3 https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2022-4-3
Lund, B., Mannuru, N. R., Teel, Z. A., Lee, T. H., Ortega, N. J., Simmons, S., & Ward, E. (2025). Student perceptions of AI-assisted writing and academic integrity: Ethical concerns, academic misconduct, and use of generative AI in higher education. AI in Education, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/aieduc1010002
Marikyan, D.& Papagiannidis, S. (2025) Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed), TheoryHub Book. Available at https://open.ncl.ac.uk /
Møgelvang, A., Bjelland, C., Grassini, S., & Ludvigsen, K. (2024). Gender differences in the use of generative artificial intelligence chatbots in higher education: Characteristics and consequences. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121363
Møgelvang, A., & Grassini, S. (2025). Validating the AI attitude scale (AIAS-4) and exploring attitudinal differences in a large sample of Norwegian university students. Discover Education, 4(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00657-6
Monteith, S., Glenn, T., Geddes, J. R., Achtyes, E. D., Whybrow, P. C., & Bauer, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence and cybercrime: Implications for individuals and the healthcare sector. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 225(4), 421–423. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.77
Morales-García, W. C., Sairitupa-Sanchez, L. Z., Morales-García, S. B., & Morales-García, M. (2024). Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of an Attitude toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (AIAS-4) among Peruvian Nurses. Behavioral Sciences, 14(6), 437. doi: 10.3390/bs14060437
Müller, V. C. (Ed.). (2016). Risks of artificial intelligence (Vol. 5). CRC Press.
Naiseh, M., Babiker, A., Al-Shakhsi, S., Cemiloglu, D., Al-Thani, D., Montag, C., & Ali, R. (2025). Attitudes towards AI: The interplay of self-efficacy, well-being, and competency. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-025-00486-2
Ofosu-Ampong, K. (2023). Gender differences in perception of artificial intelligence-based tools. Journal of Digital Art & Humanities, 4(2), 52-56. DOI: 10.33847/2712-8149.4.2_6
Petershek, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Gendered Security. https://crestresearch.ac.uk/comment/artificial-intelligence-and-gendered-security/
Pew Research Center (2025). How the U.S. Public and AI Experts View Artificial Intelligence. Accessed on April 1st 2026 from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2025/04/03/how-the-us-public-and-ai-experts-view-artificial-intelligence/#:~:text=Our%20previous%20surveys%20of%20U.S.,compared%20with%2036%25%20of%20women.&text=Among%20experts%2C%20men%20are%20also,and%20regulation%20and%20responsible%20AI.
Reina Marín, Y., Cruz Caro, O., Carrasco Rituay, A. M., Guimac Llanos, K. A., Tarrillo Perez, D., Sánchez Bardales, E., Alva Tuesta, J. N., & Chávez Santos, R. (2025). Ethical challenges associated with the use of artificial intelligence in university education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 2443–2467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09660-w
Renz, S., Kalimeris, J., Hofreiter, S., & Spörrle, M. (2024). Me, myself and AI: How gender, personality and emotions determine willingness to use Strong AI for self-improvement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 209, 123760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123760
Rosen, L. D., Whaling, K., Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., & Rokkum, J. (2013). The media and technology usage and attitudes scale: An empirical investigation. Computers in human behavior, 29(6), 2501-2511. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.006
Russo, C., Romano, L., Clemente, D., Iacovone, L., Gladwin, T. E., & Panno, A. (2025). Gender differences in artificial intelligence: the role of artificial intelligence anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1559457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1559457
Sabour, S., Liu, J. M., Liu, S., Liu, S., Yao, C.Z., Cui, S., Zhang, X., Zhang, W., Cao, Y., Bhat, A., Guan, J., Wu, W., Mihalcea, R., Wang, H., Althoff, T., Lee, T.M.C. & Huang, M. (2025). Human decision-making is susceptible to AI-driven manipulation. arXiv, 2502.07663. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.07663
Sah, R., Hagemaster, C., Adhikari, A., Lee, A., & Sun, N. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: Student and faculty perspectives on use, ethics, and impact. Information Systems Education Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_129
Salazar Garcés, L. F., & Velastegui Hernandez, D. C. V. (2024). Inteligencia artificial y su impacto en la psicología humana: Mini revisión. Mediciencias UTA, 8(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.31243/mdc.uta.v8i1.2306
Schepman, A., and Rodway, P. (2020). Initial validation of the general attitudes towards artificial intelligence scale. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 1,100014. doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014
Schepman, A., and Rodway, P. (2023). The general attitudes towards artificial intelligence scale (GAAIS): confirmatory validation and associations with personality, corporate disgust, and general trust. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39, 2724–2741. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2085400
Scherer, M. U. (2015). Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. Harv. JL & Tech., 29, 353.
Shen, C., Li, C., Xu, F., Wang, Z., Shen, X., Gao, J., ... & Cui, Y. (2020). Web-based study on Chinese dermatologists’ attitudes towards artificial intelligence. Annals of translational medicine, 8(11), 698. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.102
Sindermann, C., Sha, P., Zhou, M., Wernicke, J., Schmitt, H. S., Li, M., ... & Montag, C. (2021). Assessing the attitude towards artificial intelligence: Introduction of a short measure in German, Chinese, and English language. KI-Künstliche intelligenz, 35(1), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00689-0
Slimi, Z., & Carballido, B. V. (2023). Navigating the Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: An Analysis of Seven Global AI Ethics Policies. TEM journal, 12(2), 590-602. DOI: 10.18421/TEM122-02
Stein, J. P., Messingschlager, T., Gnambs, T., Hutmacher, F., & Appel, M. (2024). Attitudes towards AI: measurement and associations with personality. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 2909. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53335-2
Vega-Reinel, S. V., Palacios-Zúñiga, R. M., Pazmiño-Gaibor, Á. X., Peña Moraima, P., & García-Laje, C. A. (2025). Implicaciones éticas del uso de inteligencia artificial generativa en la formación universitaria: dilema entre la innovación tecnológica y la responsabilidad académica. Reicomunicar, 8(15), 833-851. https://doi.org/10.46296/rc.v8i15.0361
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3375136
Wickramasinghe, M., Gunawardena, L., & Padukkage, A. (2025). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education: A meta-review approach. AI and Ethics, 6, artículo 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00878-3
Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., Lin, T. J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z
Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: A threat to academic integrity or reformation? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6
Zhang, X., Chan, F. T., Yan, C., & Bose, I. (2022). Towards risk-aware artificial intelligence and machine learning systems: An overview. Decision Support Systems, 159, 113800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2022.113800
Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: a multigroup analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7
