ИНАТ И СТРОГИ РЕЦИПРОЦИТЕТ У ИГРИ ПРЕГОВАРАЊА: ЕКСПЕРИМЕНТАЛНА СТУДИЈА
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME200819061MKljučne reči:
инат, реципроцитет, правичност, инаџијско понашање, коначна понудаApstrakt
Предмет овог рада је инат и инаџијско понашање из угла бихевиористичке економије. Спроведена је експериментална студија коришћењем „мини-ултиматум игре“ са потпуним информацијама о исплатама и неповољној спољашњој опцији. Узорак је формиран од 748 студената Правног факултета Универзитета у Нишу и Правног факултета Универзитета у Београду. У експерименталном дизајну „између субјеката“, 604 различитих учесника тестирано је у контролној и експерименталној групи. У дизајну „унутар субјеката“, 144 учесника представљало је „сопствену контролну групу“. Главни налаз је да постоји статистички значајна веза између спољашње опције и избора учесника, при чему је око једне трећине њих показало инаџијско понашање. Такође, установљена је статистички значајна разлика између испитаника из Београда и Ниша у погледу правичног третмана, али не и разлика у уделу оних субјеката који су испољили инат – без регионалних разлика у погледу ината. Није утврђена разлика према полу у погледу правичног третмана, али су особе женског пола у Нишу исказале статистички незнатно већи ниво инаџијског понашања. Студија отвара врата даљим истраживањима са акцентом на субјекте различитих старосних група и додатне карактеристике инаџијског понашања.
Reference
Abbink, K., & Sadrieh, A. (2009). The pleasure of being nasty. Economics Letters, 105(3), 306–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.08.024
Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6
Almakias, S., & Weiss, A. (2012). Ultimatum Game behavior in light of attachment theory. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(3), 515–526. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.12.012
Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133
Becker, A., Deckers, T., Dohmen, T., Falk, A., & Kosse, F. (2011). The Relationship Between Economic Preferences and Psychological Personality Measures. Annual Review of Economics, 4(1), 453–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110922
Bolton, G. E. (1991). A Comparative Model of Bargaining: Theory and Evidence. The American Economic Review, 81(5), 1096–1136. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2006908
Bowles, S., & Polania-Reyes, S. (2012). Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements? Journal of Economic Literature, 50(2), 368–425. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.2.368
Camerer, C. F. (2011). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press.
Carpenter, J. (2010). social preferences BT - Behavioural and Experimental Economics (S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume, Eds.; pp. 247–252). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280786_31
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009
Cullis, J., Jones, P., & Soliman, A. (2012). “Spite effects” in tax evasion experiments. Journal of Socio-Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.05.011
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2010). Are Risk Aversion and Impatience Related to Cognitive Ability? American Economic Review, 100(3), 1238–1260. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.1238
Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). On the Nature of Fair Behavior. Economic Inquiry, 41(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/41.1.20
Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2005). Driving Forces behind Informal Sanctions. Econometrica, 73(6), 2017–2030. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3598757
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2002). Why social preferences matter - The impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. Economic Journal, 112(478), C1–C33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00027
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(6960), 785–791. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02043
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.159
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1038/415137a
Fehr, E., Gächter, S., & Kirchsteiger, G. (1997). Reciprocity as a Contract Enforcement Device: Experimental Evidence. Econometrica, 65(4), 833–860. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171941
Fehr, E., Glätzle-Rützler, D., & Sutter, M. (2013). The development of egalitarianism, altruism, spite and parochialism in childhood and adolescence. European Economic Review, 64, 369–383. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.09.006
Fehr, E., Hoff, K., & Kshetramade, M. (2008). Spite and Development. American Economic Review, 98(2), 494–499. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.494
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2586885
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006). Chapter 8 The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism – Experimental Evidence and New Theories. In S.-C. Kolm & J. M. B. T.-H. of the E. of G. Ythier Altruism and Reciprocity (Eds.), Foundations (Vol. 1, pp. 615–691). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0714(06)01008-6
Gardner, A., & West, S. A. (2004). Spite and the scale of competition. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17(6), 1195–1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00775.x
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4), 367–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
Hamilton, W. D. (1970). Selfish and Spiteful Behaviour in an Evolutionary Model. Nature, 228(5277), 1218–1220. https://doi.org/10.1038/2281218a0
Herrmann, B., Thöni, C., & Gächter, S. (2008). Antisocial Punishment Across Societies. Science, 319(5868), 1362 LP – 1367. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1153808
Jovanović, B. (2008). Psihologija inata [Psychology of Spite]. Polja, 454, 116–122.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (2011). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. In Advances in Behavioral Economics. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.7
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (2018). The endowment effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias. In Experiments in Environmental Economics. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.193
Kimbrough, E. O., & Reiss, J. P. (2012). Measuring the Distribution of Spitefulness. PLOS ONE, 7(8), e41812. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041812
Levine, D. K. (1998). Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1(3), 593–622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.1998.0023
Marcus, D. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., Mercer, S. H., & Norris, A. L. (2014). The psychology of spite and the measurement of spitefulness. Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036039
Pillutla, M. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (1996). Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0100
Rotemberg, J. J. (2008). Minimally acceptable altruism and the ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.06.008
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300(5626), 1755 LP – 1758. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082976
Sylwester, K., Herrmann, B., & Bryson, J. J. (2013). Homo homini lupus? Explaining antisocial punishment. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000009
West, S. A., Griffin, A. S., & Gardner, A. (2007). Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20(2), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x
Williams, R. (2012). Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata Journal. https://doi.org/The Stata Journal
Wobker, I. (2015). The Price of Envy-An Experimental Investigation of Spiteful Behavior. Managerial and Decision Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2672
Yamagishi, T., Horita, Y., Mifune, N., Hashimoto, H., Li, Y., Shinada, M., Miura, A., Inukai, K., Takagishi, H., & Simunovic, D. (2012). Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(50), 20364–20368. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212126109
Zizzo, D. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Are People Willing to Pay to Reduce Others’ Incomes? Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 63/64, 39–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/20076295
