КОМБИНОВАНО КОРИШЋЕЊЕ МЕТОДОЛОГИЈЕ СОФТ СИСТЕМА И МЕТОДОЛОГИЈЕ КОМПЛЕКСНОСТИ: ПРИМЕР УПРАВЉАЊА ДРУШТВЕНОМ ОДГОВОРНОШЋУ ПРЕДУЗЕЋА
Ključne reči:
управљање проблемским ситуацијама, Методологија софт система, Методологија комплексности, комбиновање методологија, корпоративна друштвена одговорностApstrakt
Полазећи од мањкавости индивидуалне примене системских методологија у бављењу управљачким проблемским ситуацијама, у раду је разматрана могућа комбинована примена Методологије софт система (МСС), која припада интерпретативној парадигми, и функционалистичке Методологије комплексности (МК) у структурирању комплексно-плуралистичких проблемских подручја. Поштујући својства друштвено одговорног пословања (ДОП) предузећа, комбинована примена наведених методологија представљена је кроз хипотетички пример управљања друштвеном одговорношћу предузећа АБЦ. Рад показује да уколико се МСС примени као доминантна, а МК као методологија подршке у управљању проблемским ситуацијама у предузећима, биће отклоњене одређене мањкавости њихове индивидуалне примене. Упркос неизбежним ограничењима, рад пружа и одређени допринос истраживању важних питања у systems science-у и management science-у, као што су могућности комбиновања различитих системских методологија, а посебно методологија које припадају различитим парадигмама. Осим тога, комбиновање ове две методологије до сада није довољно истраживано.
Reference
Aguilera, R.V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A. & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations, Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.567842
Brown J., Cooper, C., & Pidd, M. (2006). A taxing problem: The complementary use of hard and soft OR in the public sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 172 (2), 666-679.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Checkland, P. & Wilson, B. (1980). ‘Primary task’ and ‘issue-based’ root definitions in systems studies. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 7, 51–54.
Checkland, P. & Tsouvalis, C. (1997). Reflecting on SSM: The Link between Root Definitions and Conceptual Models. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14 (3), 153-168.
Checkland, P. (2000a). The Emergent Properties of SSM in Use: A Symposium by Reflective Practitioners. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 13 (6), 799-823.
Checkland, P. (2000b). Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17 (S1), pp. 11-58.
Commission of the European Communities, (2001a), Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, Brussels: EUR-Lex(Official Journal of the European Communities)
Commission of the European Communities, (2001b), Green Paper - Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility, Brussels.
Dare, J. (2016). Will the Truth Set Us Free? An Exploration of CSR Motive and Commitment. Business and Society Review, 121(1), 85-122. DOI: 10.1111/basr.12082
Devinney, T.M. (2009). Is the Socially Responsible Corporation a Myth? The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44-56.
Gharajedaghi, J. (2011). System Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity – A Platform for Designing Business Architecture. Elsevier – Morgan Kaufmann.
Gibson, K. (2000). The Moral Basis of Stakeholder Theory, Journal of Business Ethics 26 (3), 245–257.
Henao, F. & Franco, A. (2016). Unpacking multimethodology: Impacts of a community development intervention. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(3), 681-696.
Howick, S. & Ackerman, F. (2011). Mixing OR methods in practice: Past, present and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 215 (3), 503-511.
Huaxia, Z. (2010), Soft systems methodology and ‘soft’ philosophy of science. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(2), 156–170.
Jackson, M. C. (2003). System Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. Chichester: John Wiley&Sons Ltd.
Koh, H. C., & Boo, E. H. Y. (2004). Organisational ethics and employee satisfaction and commitment. Management Decision, 42 (5), 677-693.
Kotiadis, K. & Mingers, J. (2006). Combining PSMs with Hard OR Methods: The Philosophical and Practical Challenges. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57 (7), 856-867.
Kotler, P. & Lee, N. (2005). Korporativna društvena odgovornost – učiniti najbolje za svoju kompaniju i za izabrani društveni cilj[Corporate Social Responsibility – Doing the Best for Your Company and for the Chosen Social Goal]. Beograd: Hesperia.
Mingers, J. & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a Framework for Mixing Methodologies. Omega – International Journal for Management Science. 25, 489-509.
Mingers, J. & Taylor, S. (1992). The Use of Soft Systems Methodology in Practice. Journal of Operational Research Society, 43 (4), 321-332.
Mingers, J. (2001). Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology. Information Systems Research, 12, 240-259.
Mingers, J. (2003). A Clasification of the Philosophical Assumptions of Management Science Methods. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54 (6), 559-570.
Munro, I. & Mingers, J. (2002). The Use of Multimethodology in Practice-Results of a Survey of Practitioners. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53 (4), 369-378.
Petrovic, S. P. (2013). A Holistic Instrumentarium for Creative Managing the Problem Situations, Themes, 37(1), 97-116.
Petrovic, S. P. (2012). Pluralism in Structuring the Management Problem Situations. Themes, 36(2), 797-814.
Petrovic, S. P. (2010). System thinking, Systems methodologies. Faculty of Economics University of Kragujevac.
Petrovic, S. P. (2005). The complexity paradigm in management reconceptualizing. Economic Annals, 167, 107-139.
Petrovic, S. P. (2004). System approach to solving practical management problems. Economic Annals, 160, 147-177.
Porter, M. & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and Society – The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
Stacey, R. D. (1995). The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes, Strategic Management Journal, 16 (6), 477–495.
Stacey, R. D. (1996). Complexity and Creativity in Organizations. Berret-Kohler, San Francisco.
Stojanovic-Aleksic, V. (2007). Leadership and organizational changes). Faculty of Economics University of Kragujevac).
Zlatanovic, D. (2015a). A Holistic Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility as a Prerequisite for Sustainable Development: Empirical Evidence, Economic Annals, 60(207), 69-94. DOI:10.2298/EKA1507069Z
Zlatanovic, D. (2015b). Methodological aspects of the combined use of system methodologies in managing problem situations in business economics (doctoral thesis). Faculty of Economics University of Kragujevac.
