ЕВАЛУАЦИЈА ЕКОНОМСКОГ ЕКСПАНЗИОНИЗМА КРОЗ ПРИЗМУ ВИШЕСТРУКЕ ДИСЦИПЛИНАРНОСТИ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME1803979MKljučne reči:
експанзионизам, економски империјализам, интердисциплинарност, мултидисциплинарност, вишеструка дисциплинарностApstrakt
О економији се говори и пише више него што се зна и разуме. Она у тој мери прожима наше животе да тврдња „сви смо ми помало економисти” представља смислен, иако не нужно истинит, исказ (осим, евентуално, у врло уском поимању економије као умећа). Ипак, економија би, као и свака друга наука, била излишна „кад би се облик и суштина ствари непосредно подударали”. Иако економисти не оспоравају преплитање науке и умећа, већина ће рећи да се економија етаблирала као научна дисциплина са особеним подручјем истраживања. Такође, знатан број економиста ће подржати тежње о трансферу, те спорадичној или организованој размени идеја, концепата и метода између различитих подручја истраживања. Следствено томе, економисти ће у начелу прихватити експанзионизам као позитиван тренд који економији и другим дисциплинама доноси само корист. Циљ овог текста је да, кроз преглед релевантне литературе, прикаже покушај економије да оствари своје експанзионистичке амбиције и афирмише се као универзална наука, ослонивши се на погрешно тумачење, а можда и злоупотребу идеје вишеструке дисциплинарности.
Reference
Akerlof, G. (1983), Loyalty Filters. American Economie Review, 73(1), 54-63.
Becker, G.S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Biglan, A. (1975). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195-203
Bridges, D. (2006). The Disciplines and the Discipline of Educational Research, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40 (2), 259-272
Collander, D., Holt, R. & Rosser, J. (2004). The changing face of mainstream economics, Review of Political Economy, 16(4), 485-499.
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press.
Coyle, D. (2012). Economics education after the crisis: are graduate students fit for purpose? Retrieved from: http://www.res.org.uk/view/article5apr12Correspondence.html
Davis, J. (2015). Economics imperialism versus multidisciplinarity, 2015 STOREP Conference Plenary Lecture, Retrieved from: http://www.johnbryandavis.net/uploads/2/2/7/3/22734340/econ_imperialism.pdf
Davis, J. (2013). Economics, Neuroeconomics, and the Problem of Identity, Retrieved from: http://epublications.marquette.edu/econ_workingpapers/53
Davis, J. (2010). Mäki on economics imperialism. Retrieved from http://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=econ_workingpapers
Davis, J. (2008). The turn in recent economics and the return of orthodoxy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(3), 349-366.
Davis, J. (2007). The turn in recent economics and return of orthodoxy. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1004064
Dow, S. (2013). Formalism, rationality and evidence: the case of behavioural economics, In: Special issue in honour of Mark Blaug, Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 6(3), 26-43.
Ellison, S. (2014). Attack of the cyborgs: Economic imperialism and the human deficit in educational policy-making & research. Journal of Educational Controversy, 8(1), 1-15.
Emmett, R.B. (2009). History of economics and history of science: A comparative look at recent work in both fields. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/1108264/History_of_economics_and_history_of_science_A_comparative_look_at_recent_work_in_both_fields.
Fine, B. (2000). Economics imperialism and intellectual progress: The present as history of economic thought? History of Economics Review, 32(1), 10-36.
Fine, B. & Milonakis, D. (2009). From economics imperialism to freakonomics: The shifting boundaries between economics and other social sciences. New York: Routledge.
Fox, J. (2013). The end of economists imperialism. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2013/01/the-end-of-economists-imper.html.
Friedman, D. (1999), Evolutionary Economics Goes Mainstream: A Review of The Theory of Learning in Games. Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.399.2801&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Fuller S. (1991), Disciplinary boundaries and the rhetoric of the social sciences. Poetics Today, 12(2), 301–325.
Goel, S. (2010). Well rounded curriculum – an insight from Biglan’s classification of disciplines, Retrieved from: https://goelsan.wordpress.com/2010/07/27/biglans-classification-of-disciplines/
Granovetter, M. & Swedberg, R. (eds.). (1992). The Sociology of Economic Life. Westview Press.
Hausmann, D. (1992). The limits of economic science, In: Hausman, D. (ed.), Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology, (pp. 99-105), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kalleberg, A. (1995). Sociology and Economics: Crossing the Boundaries, Social Forces, 73(4), 1207-1218
King, J. (2013). A case for pluralism in economics, The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 24(1), 17-31.
Krishnan, A. (2009). What are Academic Disciplines, Some Observations on the Disciplinarity vs Interdisciplinarity debate, Retrieved from: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/783/1/what_are_academic_disciplines.pdf
Lattuca, L., Terenzini, P., Harper, B.J. & Yin, A. (2010), Academic environments in detail: Holland’s theory at the sub-discipline level, Research in Higher Education, 51(1), 21-39.
Lazear, E. (2000). Economic imperialism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1), 99-146.
Leape, J. (2012). Good economists need more than economics: multidisciplinary LSE 100 course“. In: Coyle, D. (ed.) What’s the use of economics? Teaching the dismal science after the crisis. (pp. 183-192). London, UK: London Publishing Partnership.
Lehtinen, U. (2013). Multidisciplinarity in theory building: possibilities of combining, Retrieved from: http://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/viewFile/1225/1234
Lyotard, J. M. (1984). The Postmodern Condition, A Report on Knowledge, Manchester: Manchester University Press
Mäki, U. (2008). Economics imperialism: Concept and constraints. Retrieved from http://www.helsinki.fi/tint/maki/materials/ImpCCproofs3.pdf.
Mirowski, P. (2002). Machine dream: Economics becomes a cyborg science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oswick, C. Feleming, P. & Hanlon, G. (2011). From Borrowing to Blending: Rethinking the Processes of Organizational Theory Building, Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 318 – 337.
Panhans, M.T. & J.D. Singleton, J.D. (2015). The empirical economist’s toolkit: From models to methods. CHOPE Working Paper No. 2015-03, Center for the History of Political Economy, Duke University. Retrieved from http://hope.econ.duke.edu/node/1126.
Petrisor, A.I. (2013). Multi-, trans- and inter-disciplinarity, essential conditions for the sustainable development of human habitat, Retrieved from: http://uac.incd.ro/Art/v4n2a06.pdf
Pforr, T. (2015). Meaning construction and the socialisation of economic ideas: an autobiographical approach. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
Pomorina, I. & Lait, A. (2012), What post-crisis changes does the economics discipline need? Retrieved from: http://www.res.org.uk/view/article5apr12Correspondence.html
Rothschild, K.W. (2008). Economic imperialism. Retrieved from http://www.analyse-und-kritik.net/2008-2/AK_Rothschild_2008.pdf
Savoiu, G. & V. Dinu, (2015). Economic Paradoxism and Meson Economics, Amfiteatru Economic, 17(39), 776-798.
Savoiu, G. (2014). The impact of inter -, trans – and multidisciplinarity on modern taxonomy of sciences, Current Science, 106(5), 685 – 690.
Sharma, S.K. (2014), Multi-disciplinarity of sciences, current economics and business, International Journal of Multidisciplinarity in Business and Science, 1(1), 1-5.
Solow, R. M. (2008). The state of macroeconomics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(1), 243-246.
Stilwell, F. (2012). Teaching political economy: Making a difference? Retrieved from http://spe.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/spe/article/view/18578/15509
WEF (2016), Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017.
