SISTEMSKI PRILAZ UNAPREĐENJU INOVATIVNOSTI U VISOKOM OBRAZOVANJU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME180703001ZKljučne reči:
Inovacije, unapređenje inovativnosti, visoko obrazovanje, Metodologija soft sistemaApstrakt
Inovativnost se može posmatrati kao ključnakonkurentska prednost u organizacijama koje nastoje da unaprede svoju efektivnost i stvore osnovu za održivi razvoj. Inovacije u sistemu visokog obrazovanja utiču na sve elemente sistema, odnose između njih, kao i na sistem višeg reda u kome visokoobrazovne institucije funkcionišu. Navedeno implicira holistički prilaz upravljanju inovativnošću u visokom obrazovanju. Shodno tome, rad se bavi relevantim pitanjima i problemima upravljanja inovativnošću u visokom obrazovanju iz perspektive Metodologije soft sistema (MSS), kao relevantnog interpretativnog sistemskog prilaza. Ključna svrha rada je da se pokaže kako ovaj sistemski prilaz može da pomogne u istraživanju kompleksne i pluralističke prirode upravljanja inovativnošću u visokom obrazovanju, kao i stvaranju osnove za unapređenje inovativnosti u visokom obrazovanju. Doprinos rada se ogleda u otkrivanju različitih percepcija i interpretacija koje relevantni stakeholderi imaju o upravljanju inovativnošću u visokom obrazovanju, kao i identifikovanju sistemski poželjnih i kulturalno izvodivih promena kojima se može unaprediti inovativnost u visokom obrazovanju. Saznanja u radu će biti korisna za visokoobrazovne institucije kako bi poboljšale svoju inovativnost.Reference
Al-Husseini, S. and Elbeltagi, I. (2016). Transformational leadership and innovation: a comparison study between Iraq’s public and private higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 159–181.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927848
Babić, V. & Savović, S. (2015). Podsticajni faktori razvoja univerzitetskih spinof poduhvata (Incentive factors for the development of university spin-offs), U Mimović, P. (red). Univerzitetskispinofpoduhvati-organizacioni okvir za realizaciju interdisciplinarnih projekata (University spinoffs - an organizational framework for the realization of interdisciplinary projects) (str.33-67), Kragujevac: Univerzitet uKragujevcu, Ekonomskifakultet.
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J. &Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a Multidisciplinary Definition of Innovation. Management Decision, 47 (8), 1323–1339.DOI 10.1108/00251740910984578
Bennet, L. M. &Kerr, M. A. (1996). A Systems Approach to the Implementation of Total Quality Management. Total Quality Management, 7 (6), 631-665.DOI 10.1080/09544120100000022
Bennetts, P. D. C., Mills, S. & Wood-Harper, A.T. (2000). Role-play in inquiring systems and information systems development. Systems Research and Behavioral Science,17, 231-242.Doi 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(200005/06)17:3<231::AID-SRES317>3.0.CO;2-B
Bouchikhi, H. & Kimberly, R. (2001). It’s difficult to innovate’: The death of the tenured professor and the birth of the knowledge entrepreneur. Human Relations, 54(1), 77-84. doi:10.1177/0018726701541010
Brennan, J., Ryan, S., Ranga, M., Broek, S., Durazzi, N., Kamphuis, B. (2014). Study on innovation in higher education: Final Report Study on Innovation in Higher Education Executive Summary.
Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 212-239. doi: 10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8
Checkland, P. (1996). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons
Checkland P. (2000). Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective.Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17 (S1), 11-58.
Checkland, P. & Tsouvalis, C. (1997). Reflecting on SSM: The Link Between Root Definitions and Conceptual Models. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14 (3), 153-168. doi.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199705/06)14:3<153::AID-SRES134>3.0.CO;2-H
Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2010). Soft Systems Methodology. In M. Reynolds, & S. Holwell (Eds.), Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide (pp. 191-242). London: Springer
Díaz-Parra, O.; Ruiz-Vanoye, J. A.; Barrera-Cámara, R. A.; Fuentes-Penna, A. & Sandoval, N. (2014). Soft Systems Methodology for the Strategic Planning of the Enterprise Computer Security. International Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Informatics, 5(1), 2-14.
Ellis, D. (2015). What Discourages Students from Engaging with Innovative Instructional Methods: Creating a Barrier Framework. Innovative Higher Education, 40, 111-125.DOI 10.1007/s10755-014-9304-5
European Commission (2010). Europe 2020 Strategy. available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/47687/1/Europe_2020.pdf
EuropeanUnion. (2006). Innovation Management and the Knowledge-Driven Economy. Brussels: European Union.
Fahey, D. K., Carson, E. R., Cramp, D. G. & Muir Gray, J. A. (2004). Applying Systems Modelling to Public Health. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21, 635-649.doi.org/10.1002/sres.602
Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen Years of Research on Business Model Innovation: How Far Have We Come, and Where Should We Go? Journal of Management, 43(1), 200-227. doi: 10.1177/0149206316675927
Garcίa, M. L. & Roblin, P. N. (2008). Innovation, research and professional development in higher education: Learning from our own experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 (1), 104-116.doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.03.007
Garrison, D.R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7 (2), 95–105.
Gregory, W. J. & Midgley, G. (2000). Planning for disaster: developing a multi-agency counselling service. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 278-290.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600912
Hasanefendic, S., Birkholz, J.M., Horta, H. & van der Sijde, P. (2017). Individuals in action: bringing about innovation in higher education. European Journal of Higher Education, 7 (2), 101-119.doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2017.1296367
Jacobs, B. (2004). Using Soft Systems Methodology for Performance Improvement and Organisational Change in the English National Health Service,Journalof Contingenciesand CrisisManagement, 12 (4), 138-149.doi.org/10.1111/j.0966-0879.2004.00444.x
Klomp, L. & Leeuwen, G. (2001). Linking Innovation and Firm Performance: A New Approach. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8 (3), 343-364. DOI: 10.1080/13571510110079612
Kunnari, I. & Ilomäki, L. (2016). Reframing teachers’ work for educational innovation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53 (2), 167–178.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.978351
Lašáková, A., Bajzíková, L. & Dedze, I. (2017). Barriers and drivers of innovation in higher education: Case study-based evidence across ten European universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 55, 69-79.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.06.002
Lockett, N., Brown, D. & Sissons, A.(2006). Soft Systems Methodology in IT Project Management: Implementing CRM inSMEs. AMCIS 2006 Proceedings (3722-3732).
Loffler, K., Tschirky, H. &Kijima. K.J. (2009). Embedding Enterprise Science into SSM for Improving Innovation Systems in Technology-Based Companies. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26, 675-687.doi.org/10.1002/sres.962
Maje, M & Sunjka, B. P. (2014).The Application of Soft Systems Methodology to Supply Chain Risk Management in Small and Medium Enterprises. In (Schutte, C. ed.) Southern African Institute for Industrial Engineering SAIIE26 Proceedings(pp. 317-331).
Nedelko, Z. & Potočan, V. (2013). The role of management innovativeness in modern organizations. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 7 (1), 36-49. doi.org/10.1108/17506201311315590
Neves, L.M.P., Martins, A. G., Antunes, C. H. & Dias, L.C. (2004). Using SSM to rethink the analysis of energy efficiency initiatives. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55, 968-975. doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601763
OECD (2016). Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills, OECD Publishing. Paris. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en
Petrović, S. P. (2013). A Holistic Instrumentarium for Creative Managing the Problem Situations. Teme, 37 (1), 97-116.
Potocan, V., Nedelko, Z., Mulej, M., & Dabic, M. (2016). How University’s Activities Support the Development of Students’ Entrepreneurial Abilities: Case of Slovenia and Croatia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-19. doi: 10.1007/s13132-016-0407-3
Presley, A., Sarkis, J. &Liles, D. (1998). Participative Design Using Soft Systems Methodology, AMCIS Proceedings, 270.
Roffei, M. H. S., Kamarulzaman, Y. & Yusop, D. F. (2016). Innovation culture in higher learnign instituions: A proposed framework. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 401-408.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.064
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
Serdykov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it?Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4-33.
Skarzynski, P., & Gibson, R. (2008). Innovation to the core. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Smith, K. (2000). Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinkingthe Role of Policy. Enterprise & Innovation Management Studies, 1(1), 73- 102.doi.org/10.1080/146324400363536
Tierney, W.G. and Lanford, M. (2016b). Conceptualizing Innovation in Higher Education. In: Paulsen, M. (ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (pp.1-32), Vol. 31, Springer
Ulrich, W. (1994). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning – A New Approach to Practcal Philosophy. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons
Yadin, A. (2013). Soft Systems Methodology in an EducationalContext—Enhancing Students Perception and Understanding. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 3 (5), 351-356.DOI: 10.7763/IJEEEE.2013.V3.25
Valenčić-Zuljan, M. and Vogrinc, J. (eds). (2010). Facilitating Effective Student Learning through Teacher Research and Innovation. Ljubljana: Faculty of Education
Zlatanović, D. (2015). A Holistic Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility as a Prerequisite for Sustainable Development: Empirical Evidence, Economic Annals, 60, 69-94.DOI:10.2298/EKA1507069Z
Zlatanović, D. & Mulej, M. (2015). Soft-systems approaches to knowledge-cum-values management as innovation drivers, Baltic Journal of Management, 10 (4), 497-518. doi.org/10.1108/BJM-01-2015-00
Zlatanović, D. (2016). Kombinovanje metodologija Identifikovanja i testiranja strategisjkih pretpostavki i Organizacione kibernetike u upravlјanju problemskim situacijama u preduzećima (Combining the methodologies of Strategic Assumptions Surfacing and Testing and Organizational Cybernetics in managing the problem situations in enterprises). Ekonomski horizonti, 18(1), 15-32. doi: 10.5937/ekonhor1601015Z,
Zlatanović, D. & Nikolić, J. (2017). Strategic decision making from the viewpoint of systems thinking : the role of values and context. In: Nedelko, Z. & Brzozowski, M. (eds). Exploring the influence of personal values and cultures in the workplace (98-118). Hershey: Business Science Reference
