CULTURE, POWER AND STRUCTURE OF ORGANIZATION: AN INTEGRATIVE RESEARCH FRAMEWORK
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to develop an integrative research framework for analyzing the relationships between organizational culture, power, and structure. Organization is observed as a configuration of mutually consistent components, so the main research question emerges: How organizational components impact each other? In this paper, the answer to this question is given through the analysis of the interrelationships between organizational culture, power and structure by applying the metaphor of the hologram. We started from the position that an organization must be understood as a state arising from the processes at both individual and organizational levels. The organization members’ needs for affiliation, power and achievement generate psychosocial, political and functional actions at the individual level, as well as the same processes at the organizational level. These processes generate organizational culture, power and structure as elements of the organization. However, the key idea is that culture, power and structure are derived from the wholeness of organizational processes and therefore contain each other as a kind of hologram. As a result, culture legitimizes power and structure, power instrumentalizes culture and structure, while structure institutionalizes culture and power. The paper shows practical implications of an integrative research framework both through defining further directions for research into relationships between culture, power and structure, as well as through showing to the management of organizations why it is necessary to understand and take into account the mutual consistency between culture, power, and structure.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alderfer, C. (1972). Existence, relatedness and growth. New York: Free Press.
Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. London: Sage Publications.
Alvesson, M., & Borg O. (1992). Corporate culture and organizational symbolism: an overview. Berlin: Gruyter.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bolman L., & Deal T. (2017). Reframing organizations. 6th ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Corley, K., & Gioia, D. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486
Dandridge, T., Mitroff, I., & Joyce, W. (1980). Organizational symbolism: A topic to expand organizational analysis. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 77–82. doi.org/10.5465/amr.1980.4288894
Dow G. (1988). Configurational and coactivational view of organizational structure. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 53–64. doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306781
Eva, N., Sendjaya, S., Prajogo, D., Cavanagh, A. & Robin, M. (2018). Creating strategic fit: Aligning servant leadership with organizational structure and strategy, Personnel Review, 47(1), 166-186. doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2016-0064
French, J. & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright, (Ed.), Studies in Social Power, (150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Geertz C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books
Gioia D., & Pitre E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–682. doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758
Guba, E. (1985). The context of emergent paradigm research. In I. Lincoln (Ed.) Organizational Theory and Inquire. (79–106). New York: Sage.
Handy, C.,1979. Gods of management. London: Pan
Itkin, H., & Nagy, M. (2014). Theoretical and practical use of metaphors in organizational development and beyond. Pannon Management Review, 3(4), 37–72.
James, L., James, L., & Ashe D. (1990) The meaning of organizations: The role of cognition and values. In B. Schneider (Ed.) Organizational climate and culture. (40–85). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Janićijević, N. (2017). Organizational models as configurations of structure, culture, leadership, control, and change strategy. Economic Annals, LXII (213), 67–92. doi:10.2298/EKA1713067J
Janićijević, N. (2013). The mutual impact of organizational culture and structure. Economic Annals, LVIII, (198), 35–60. doi:10.2298/EKA1398035J
Janićijević, N. (2012). The Influence of organizational culture on organizational preferences towards the choice of organizational change strategy. Economic Annals, LVII (193), 25–52. doi: 10.2298/EKA1293025J
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power. London: Macmillan.
Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Maslow, A. (1943). A Theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.
McClelland, D. (1961). Achievement society. New York: Free Press.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Mintzberg, H. & Miller, D. (1984). The case for configuration. In D. Miller, & P. Friesen Organizations: A Quantum View, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organization. Marshfield: Pitman.
Pugh, D. S., & Hickson, D. J. (2016). Great writers on organizations. The 3rd omnibus
edition. New York: Routledge.
Rafaeli, A. & Worline, M. (2000). Symbols in organizational culture. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. M. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.) Handbook of organizational culture & climate, (71–85). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Ranson, S., Hinings, B., & Greenwood R. (1980). The structuring of organizational structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1) 1–25. doi: 10.2307/2392223
Robbins, S. & Coutler, M. (2012). Management. Boston: Prentice Hall.
Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2016). Organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Salancik, G., & Pfeffer, J. (1977). Who gets power and how they hold on to it. Organizational Dynamics, 5(3), 3–21.
Schein, E. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Shafritz, J. M., Ott, S. J., & Jang, Y. S. (2011). Classics of organizational theory. 7th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.
Smircich, L. (1983). Organizations as shared meanings. In L. Pondy, P. Frost, G. Morgan, & T. Dandridge, (Eds.). Organizational symbolism. (55–65). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Smircich, L. & Morgan G. (1982). Leadership: The management of meaning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18 3), 257–273. doi.org/10.1177/002188638201800303
Stojanović-Aleksić, V., Erić Nielsen, J. & Bošković, A. (2019). Organizational prerequisites for knowledge creation and sharing: empirical evidence from Serbia, Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(8), 1543-1565. doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0286
Tohidian, I. & Rahimian, H. (2019). Bringing Morgan’s metaphors in organization contexts: An essay review, Cogent Business & Management, 6:1, doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1587808
Tossi, H. L. (2009). Theories of organization. London: Sage.
Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63, 763–771.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME201002009J
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804