DNA DATABASES AND POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS: THE STATE OF AFFAIRS IN SERBIA REGARDING EUROPEAN STANDARDS
Abstract
DNA profiling and the storage of DNA samples and profiles in DNA databases can be widely used for forensic purposes. However, even though DNA profiling enables faster and simpler crime solving or the elimination of suspicion, its application is also associated with significant risks of limiting human rights through the violation of confidentiality of personal data. Hence, a balance should be made between the use of DNA profiling to achieve social interest, on the one side, and the protection of individual rights, on the other. The article is devoted to the analysis of the compliance of the Serbian positive legal framework with European and international standards in the context of DNA profiling for forensic purposes. The goal of the paper is to give certain recommendations of general importance, and especially recommendations regarding possible amendments to Serbian law. Also, standards deriving from the practice of The European Court of Human Rights have been singled out, which boil down to the fact that DNA profiling and data storage should be defined by a precise and sufficiently detailed legal framework that must be based on legitimate goals and must be consistent with the preservation of democratic values in modern society.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andrejević, M. (2012). Značaj forenzičke DNK analize u pravosudnom sistemu [Significance of forensic DNA analysis in the criminal justice system]. Strani pravni život, 56(2), 290-307.
Buha, M. (2018). (Ne)zakonitost posebnih istražnih radnji [(Non)legality of special investigative actions]. Srpska pravna misao, 51, 41-56. doi.org:10.7251/SPMSR1851041B
Dimovski, D. (2021). Restriction of human rights and state of emergency. Teme, 45(4), 1057-1079. doi.org/10.22190/TEME210705062D
Joh, E. E. (2011). DNA theft: recognizing the crime on nonconsensual genetic collection and testing. Boston University Law Review, 91, 665-700.
Kaye, D. H. (2001). Two Fallacies about DNA Data Banks for Law Enforcement. Brooklyn Law Review, 67, 179-206.
Lynch, M., Cole, S. A., McNally, R., & Jordan, K. (2010). Truth machine: The contentious history of DNA fingerprinting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Machado, H. & Silva, S. (2019). What influences public views on forensic DNA testing in the criminal field? A scoping review of quantitative evidence. Human Genomics, 23, 13. doi.org: 10.1186/s40246-019-0207-5
Martin P.D., Schmitter, H. & Schneider, P.M, (2001). A brief history of the formation of databases in forensic science within Europe. Forensic Science International, 119, 225-231.
Maschke, K. J. (2008). DNA and Law Enforcement IN M. Crowley (ed.) From Birth to Death and Bench to Clinic: The Hastings Center Bioethics Briefing Book for Journalists, Policymakers, and Campaigns (pp. 45-50), New York: The Hastings Center.
M’Charek, A., Hagendijk, R. & Vries, W. D. (2013). Equal before the law: On the machinery of sameness in forensic DNA practice. Science, technology, & human values, 38(4), 542-565.
Mitrović, V. (2016). Od globalne bioetike do neuroetike [From global bioethics to neuroethics]. Teme, 40(4), 1457-1475. doi.org/10.22190/TEME1604457M
Nelkin, D. & Andrews, L. (1999). DNA identification and surveillance creep. Sociology of Health & Illness, 21(5), 689-706.
Nikač, Ž. (2019). Adoption of the law on national DNA register in the Republic of Serbia. FBIM Transactions, 7, 125-133. doi.org:10.12709/fbim.07.07.01.15.
Panneerchelvam, S. & Norazmi, M. N. (2003). Forensic Profiling and Database. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences, 10(2), 20-26.
Parven, K. (2013). Forensic Use of Information v Human Rights and Privacy Challenges. University of Western, Sydney Law Review, 17, 41-65.
Rothstein, M. A. & Carnahan, S. (2001). Legal and policy issues in expanding the scope of law enforcement DNA data banks. Brooklyn Law Review, 67, 127-178.
Rothstein, M. A. & Talbott, M. K. (2006). The expanding use of DNA in Law Enforcement: What Role for Privacy? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 34(2), 153-164. doi.org:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00024.x
Sarkar, S. P. & Adshead, G. (2010). Whose DNA is it anyway? European Court, Junk DNA, and the Problem with Prediction. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 38(2), 247-250.
Tuazon, O. M. (2021). Universal Forensic DNA Databases: Acceptable or Illegal Under the European Court of Human Rights Regime? Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 8(1), 1-24. doi.org:10.1093/jlb/lsab022
Wallace, H. (2006). The UK National Database. Balancing Crime Detection, Human Rights and Privacy. EMBO Reports, 7 (Spec No), 26–30. doi.org:10.1038/sj.embor.7400727
Regulations
Законик о кривичном поступку [Criminal Procedure Code], Службени гласник РС, Бр. 72 (2011), 101 (2011), 121 (2012), 32 (2013), 45 (2013), 55 (2014), 35 (2019), 27 (2021) и 62 (2021)
Закон о посебним мерама за спречавање вршења кривичних дела против полне слободе према малолетним лицима [Law on Special Measures for the Prevention of Criminal Offenses against Sexual Freedoms against Minors], Службени гласник РС, Бр. 32 (2013)
Закон о заштити података о личности [Law on the Protection of Personal Data], Службени гласник РС, Бр. 87 (2018)
Закон о националном ДНК регистру [Law on the National DNA Database], Службени гласник РС, Бр. 24 (2018)
Закон о евиденцијама и обради података у области унутрашњих послова [Law on Records and Data Processing in the Field of Internal Affairs], Службени гласник РС, Бр. 24 (2018)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME230731004K
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804