THE LANGUAGE OF INSULTS IN THE DISCOURSE OF SERBIAN POLITICAL PARTIES ON SOCIAL MEDIA DURING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN

Tijana Vesić Pavlović

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME250128056V
First page
857
Last page
876

Abstract


Social media has an increasingly important role in the communication of political parties with their supporters and potential voters. However, previous studies argue that communication via social media may often be a tool for preserving and deepening the trends of political polarisation, which occasionally amounts to political sectarianism. This paper deals with the language of insults aimed at political opponents in social media posts on the official X and Instagram social media profiles of the leading Serbian parties during the 2023 election campaign. The analysis of posts shows that insults are very often used when mentioning political opponents. The focus of insults is most often on discrediting the opponent as a person, on their activities, which are deemed immoral (e.g. lying, stealing), on their lack of qualifications or agency, as well as their lack of patriotism. In the conclusion, the importance of the identified patterns of political communication is discussed in light of the growing polarisation in Serbian society.

Keywords

political discourse, social media, Serbia, language of insults, election campaign.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

D’Errico, F., Poggi, I., & Corriero, R. (2014). Aggressive language and insults in digital political participation. In P. Kommers, P. Isaías, C. Gauzente, M. Baptista Nunes, G. Chao Peng and M. Macedo (Eds.), Proceedings of multiconference on computer science and information systems: Web based communities and social media (pp. 105-114). Lisboa: Universidad de Lisboa.

Đurović, T. & Silaški, N. (2010). Metaphors we vote by: The case of ‘marriage’ in contemporary Serbian political discourse. Journal of language and politics, 9(2), 237-259. doi: 10.1075/jlp.9.2.04dur

Finkel, E. J., Bail, C. A., Cikara, M., Ditto, P. H., Iyengar, S., Klar, S., Mason, L., McGrath, M., Nyhan, B., Rand, D., Skitka, L., Tucker, J., Van Bavel, J., Wang. C. & Druckman, J. N. (2020). Political sectarianism in America. Science, 370(6516), 533-536. doi: 10.1126/science.abe17

Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2018). War metaphors in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2018.1407992

Kalmoe, N. P. (2014). Fueling the fire: Violent metaphors, trait aggression, and support for political violence. Political Communication, 31(4), 545-563. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2013.852642

Kalsnes, B. (2016). The social media paradox explained: Comparing political parties’ Facebook strategy versus practice. Social Media+ Society, 2(2), 2056305116644616. doi: 10.1177/205630511664

Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37-77. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37

Kruikemeier, S. (2014). How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in human behavior, 34, 131-139. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025

Kruikemeier, S., Van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R., & De Vreese, C. H. (2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 53-66. doi: 10.1177/0267323112464

Lakoff, G. (2014). The all new don’t think of an elephant!: Know your values and frame the debate. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.

Lakoff. G. & Johnson, M. (2003 [1980]). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Musolff, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23-38. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2

Nikolić, M. & Slijepčević Bjelivuk, S. (2022). Srpski javni diskurs u pandemiji [Serbian public discourse in the pandemics]. Beograd: Institut za srpski jezik SANU.

Pavlović, Z. (2022). „Draga patološka lažovčino...“ – predstava o političkom “drugom” u Srbiji tokom pandemija kovida 19 [“Dear pathological liar” – the notion of the political “other” in Serbia during the covid-19 pandemics]. Godišnjak za društvenu istoriju, 3, 139-164.

Poggi, I., & D’Errico, F. (2022). Attacking the opponent’s image: Insult as a weapon for political discredit. In I. Poggi and F. D’Errico (Eds.), Social Influence, Power, and Multimodal Communication (pp. 163-182). London/New York: Routledge.

Rasulić, K. (2020). Turning the heart into a neighbour. (Re)framing Kosovo in Serbian political discourse. In: M. Huang and L. Holmgreen (Eds.), The Language of Crisis: Metaphors, frames and discourses (pp. 111-136). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Silaški, N., & Đurović, T. (2022a). From an invisible enemy to a football match with the virus: Adjusting the Covid-19 pandemic metaphors to political agendas in Serbian public discourse. In: A. Musolff, R. Breeze, K. Kondo and S. Vilar-Lluch (Eds.), Pandemic and crisis discourse: Communicating Covid-19 and public health strategy (pp. 271-284). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Silaški, N., & Đurović, T. (2022b). It’s like being hit by a tsunami: The use of the natural force metaphor for conceptualising the COVID-19 pandemic in English and Serbian. Komunikacija i kultura online, XIII(13), 161-179. doi: 10.18485/kkonline.2022.13.13.10

Silaški, N., Đurović, T. & Radić-Bojanić, B. (2009). Javni diskurs Srbije: kognitivističko-kritička studija [Serbian public discourse: A cognitive critical study]. Beograd: Centar za izdavačku delatnost Ekonomskog fakulteta.

Silaški, Nadežda. 2023. Moć i funkcije metafora u pandemijskom diskursu [The power and functions of metaphors in the pandemic discourse]. U: V. Lopičić, B. Mišić Ilić, I. Mitić i S. Ignjatović (Ur.), Jezik, književnost, moć (str. 23-38). Niš: Univerzitet u Nišu, Filozofski fakultet. doi: 10.46630/jkm.2023.1

Slijepčević Bjelivuk, S. (2021). Šta se krije u medijskim naslovima u periodu pandemije? [What is concealed in the media headlines in the pandemics period?]. Jezik danas, XVIII(18), 25-32.

Slijepčević, S. (2012). O razvitku opozicije MI:ONI prema opoziciji MI:DRUGI u političkom diskursu Srbije [On the development of the opposition WE:THEY contrasted with the opposition WE:OTHER in the Serbian political discourse]. U: M. Kovačević (Ur.), Jezik i identitet (str. 189-195). Pale: Univerzitet u Istočnom Sarajevu, Filozofski fakultet.

Spierings, N., & Jacobs, K. (2018). Political parties and social media campaigning: A qualitative comparative analysis of parties’ professional Facebook and Twitter use in the 2010 and 2012 Dutch elections. Acta Politica, 54, 145-173. doi: 10.1057/s41269-018-0079-z

Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11-52.

Vesić Pavlović, T. (2010). Trnovit put ka demokratiji: Metafora putanje u konceptualizaciji procesa tranzicije u Srbiji [The rocky road to democracy: The journey metaphor in the conceptualization of the transition process in Serbia]. U: B. Mišić Ilić i V. Lopičić (Ur.), Jezik, književnost, promene. Jezička istraživanja (str. 302-316), Niš: Filozofski fakultet.

Vesić Pavlović, T. (2018). The role of path metaphors in conceptualising life in English and Serbian: A corpus-based analysis. Brno Studies in English, 44(1), 63-82. doi: 10.5817/BSE2018-1-4


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804