THE ACTOR-NETWORK THEORY AND THE QUESTION OF POWER: RETHINKING AGENCY AND STRUCTURE

Ivica Mladenović, Srđan Prodanović

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME250305005M
First page
037
Last page
058

Abstract


The Actor-Network Theory (ANT) represents a significant shift in the social sciences, challenging the traditional divide between structure and agency. Developed by Bruno Latour, Michel Callon, and John Law, ANT posits that both human and non-human entities actively shape social reality through interconnected networks. The passing of Bruno Latour in 2022 invites a critical reassessment of ANT’s legacy and its applicability to present-day sociotechnical transformations. This paper traces the evolution of ANT, highlighting its theoretical foundations and methodological implications. Special focus is given to the ANT’s role within the contemporary study of science, technology, and society, placing it in the context of the debates against epistemological relativism and the limited understanding of power relations. At the same time, the paper will show the advantages of ANT in explaining the dynamic interactions of heterogeneous actors while highlighting the limitations of the approach in dealing with issues of inequality. It will be argued that a better understanding and application of ANT must be achieved in conjunction with the ideas of critical social theories.


Keywords

Actor-Network Theory, Agency, Sociotechnical Systems, Power Relations, Bruno Latour.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akrich, M. (1992). The description of technical objects. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Birešev, A. (2012). Politička ekologija Bruna Latura [The political ecology of Bruno Latour]. Filozofija i društvo, 23(1), 112–125.

Butler, J. (2010). Performing agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147–161.

Callon, M. (1979). L’État face à l’innovation technique: le cas du véhicule électrique. Revue française de science politique, 29(3), 426–447.

Callon, M. (1986a). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Callon, M. (1986b). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In M. Callon, J. Law, & A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 19–34). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Callon, M. (1998). The laws of the markets. In M. Callon (Ed.), The laws of the markets (pp. 1–57). Oxford: Blackwell.

Callon, M. (2006a). Les réseaux sociaux à l’aune de la théorie de l’acteur-réseau: Entretien avec Michel Ferrary. Sociologies pratiques, 2(13), 37–44.

Callon, M. (2006b). Sociologie de l’acteur-réseau. In B. Latour, M. Akrich, & M. Callon (Eds.), Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs (pp. 63–101). Paris: École des Mines.

Callon, M. (2008). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets?: On the performativity of economics (pp. 311–357). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology (pp. 277–304). London: Routledge.

Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1992). Don’t throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearley. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 343–368). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2006). Le grand Léviathan s’apprivoise-t-il? Dans B. Latour, M. Akrich et M. Callon (dir.), Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs (pp. 11–32). Paris: École des Mines.

Callon, M., Laredo, P., & Mustar, P. (1997). The strategic management of research and technology: Evaluation of programs. Paris: Economica International.

Collin, P. M., Livian, Y. F., & Thivant, E. (2016). Michel Callon et Bruno Latour: La théorie de l’acteur-réseau. In T. Burger-Helmchen (Ed.), Les grands auteurs en management de l’innovation et de la créativité (pp. 157–178). Caen: EMS Éditions.

Collins, H. M., & Yearley, S. (1992). Epistemological chicken. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 301–326). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Cresswell, K. M., Worth, A., & Sheikh, A. (2010). Actor-network theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10(67). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-67

Crocker, S. (2021). “As soon as we are two there is a medium”: Michel Serres’ philosophy of relations. Media Theory, 5(1), 186–200.

Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York, NY: Holt.

Dubois, M. (2007). La construction métaphorique du collectif: dimensions implicites du prêt-à-penser constructiviste et de la théorie de l’acteur-réseau. L’Année sociologique, 57(1), 127–150.

Farías, I., Blok, A., & Roberts, C. (2020). Actor-network theory as a companion: An inquiry into intellectual practices. In The Routledge companion to actor-network theory (pp. xx–xxxv). New York, NY: Routledge.

Filipović, B. (2012). Bruno Latour i teorija aktera-mreže [Bruno Latour and Actor-Network Theory]. Filozofija i društvo, 23(1), 129–149.

Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Oxford: Polity Press.

Guggenheim, M., & Potthast, M. (2011). Symmetrical twins: On the relationship between actor-network theory and the sociology of critical capacities. Goldsmiths Research (online).

Janković, S. (2023). Pierre Bourdieu et Bruno Latour [Pierre Bourdieu and Bruno Latour]. In I. Mladenović, Z. Zarić, & M. Urošević (Eds.), Pjer Burdije – radikalna misao i praxis [Pierre Bourdieu – Radical Thought and Praxis] (pp. 474–506). Beograd: IFDT.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369–381.

Latour, B. (1998). To modernize or to ecologize? That’s the question. In N. Castree & B. Willems-Braun (Eds.), Remaking reality: Nature at the millennium (pp. 221–242). London and New York: Routledge.

Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 14–25). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Latour, B. (2006). Changer de société, refaire de la sociologie. Paris: La Découverte.

Latour, B. (2010). An inquiry into modes of existence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2018). Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Latour, B., Akrich, M., & Callon, M. (2006). Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs. Paris: École des Mines.

Law, J. (1986). On the methods of long-distance control: Vessels, navigation, and the Portuguese route to India. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 234–263). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.

Law, J. (2009). Actor-network theory and material semiotics. In B. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Oxford: Blackwell.

Law, J., & Hassard, J. (Eds.). (1999). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.

McGee, K. (2014). Bruno Latour: The normativity of networks. London: Routledge.

Mladenović, I. (2025). Beyond the network: A critical inquiry into the limits of the actor-network theory. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA, LXXII(1), 247–268.

Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Muniesa, F. (2015). Actor-network theory. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 80–84). Oxford: Elsevier.

Munro, R. (2009). Actor-network theory. In S. R. Clegg & M. Haugaard (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of power (pp. 125–139). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Petrov, A. (2015). Bruno Latour. Beograd: FMK.

Schinkel, W. (2007). Sociological discourse of the relational: The cases of Bourdieu and Latour. The Sociological Review, 55(4), 707–729.

Serres, M. (2007). The parasite. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Spasić, I. (2007). Bruno Latour, akteri-mreže i kritika kritičke sociologije [Bruno Latour, actor-networks and the critique of critical sociology]. Filozofija i društvo, 18(2), 43–72.

Whittle, A., & Spicer, A. (2008). Is actor-network theory a critique? A pragmatic sociology of translation. Organization Studies, 29(4), 611–629.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME250305005M

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804