MOTIVATION PROFILES OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHERS IN SERBIA: A SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY PERSPECTIVE

Nikola Stojanović, Petar Mitić, Đorđe Savić, Zvezdan Savić, Branislav Ranđelović

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME250331006S
First page
059
Last page
078

Abstract


Understanding the motivations of physical education teachers is essential for effective teaching and professional well-being. Grounded in Self Determination Theory, this study examined the interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among 3,792 physical education teachers in Serbia to identify four profiles: amotivated n = 380, 10.0 percent; extrinsically motivated n = 909, 24.0 percent; intrinsically motivated n = 946, 24.9 percent; and balanced n = 1,557, 41.1 percent. Structural Equation Modeling generated standardized latent scores with excellent model fit CFI = .987, TLI = .991, RMSEA = .045, SRMR = .051. These scores were used to compute a Motivation Index and conduct multinomial ridge regression classification, yielding overall accuracy of 78.43 percent and balanced accuracy of 80.14 percent for amotivated, 87.03 percent for balanced, 87.23 percent for extrinsic, and 95.37 percent for intrinsic profiles. Simultaneously, high intrinsic and extrinsic motivation increased the odds of balanced classification (β = 0.30 to 0.34, OR approximately 1.4, p < .01), indicating a synergistic configuration in which external demands are internalized. Low intrinsic and extrinsic motivation predicted amotivation (β = 1.10, OR = 3.00, p < .001). Higher extrinsic motivation reduced the probability of intrinsic dominance (β = −0.95, OR = 0.39, p < .001), and tempered extrinsic classification (β = −0.27, OR = 0.77, p < .001). Teachers classified as extrinsic reported high scores on both dimensions, with extrinsic motivation prevailing, whereas intrinsic dominance was most likely when intrinsic motivation was strong and extrinsic motivation comparatively lower. Higher personal physical activity and rural context favored intrinsic orientation, while greater teaching experience and classroom teacher status were negatively associated with it. These findings clarify the motivational structure of physical education teachers and identify targets for professional development and policy aimed at strengthening autonomous yet context-sensitive motivation.


Keywords

physical education teachers, motivation, Self-Determination Theory, extrinsic motivation, intrinsic motivation, motivation index.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayık, A., & Ataş, Ö. (2014). The relationship between pre-service teachers' attitudes towards the teaching profession and their motivation to teach. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 25–43.

Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, D., Jess, M., Pickup, I., & Sandford, R. (2009). The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: An academic review. Research Papers in Education, 24(1), 1–27.

Breslin, G., Hanna, D., Lowry, R. G., McKee, D., Haughey, T., & Moore, N. (2012). An exploratory study of specialist and generalist teachers: predicting self efficacy in delivering primary physical education. Working Papers in the Health Sciences, 1(1), 1-9.

Brown, D., & Evans, J. (2004). Reproducing gender? Intergenerational links and the male PE teacher as a cultural conduit in teaching physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23(1), 48-70.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer US.

Eime, R. M., Young, J. A., Harvey, J. T., Charity, M. J., & Payne, W. R. (2013). A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: Informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10(1), 98.

Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 890–898.

Hein, V., Ries, F., Pires, F., Caune, A., Ekler, J. H., Emeljanovas, A., & Valantiniene, I. (2012). The relationship between teaching styles and motivation to teach among physical education teachers. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 11(1), 123–130.

Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., & Bureau, J. S. (2020). Testing a continuum structure of self‐determined motivation: A meta‐analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(8), 719–752.

Huéscar Hernández, E., Moreno-Murcia, J. A., Ruíz González, L., & León González, J. (2019). Motivational profiles of high school physical education students: The role of controlling teacher behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10), 1714.

Kasimoglu, M. (2021). Evaluation of the motivation levels of physical education teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(2), 412–425.

Koka, A. (2013). The relationships between perceived teaching behaviors and motivation in physical education: A one-year longitudinal study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 33–53.

Mitić, P., Stojanović, N., Savić, Z., Trajković, N., & Savić, Đ. (2023). Motivating the youth: Uncovering the attitudes and motivation behind school sports engagement. TEME, 47(3), 507–526.

Pelletier, L. G., Séguin-Lévesque, C., & Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 186–196.

Retelsdorf, J., Butler, R., Streblow, L., & Schiefele, U. (2010). Teachers' goal orientations for teaching: Associations with instructional practices, interest in teaching, and burnout. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 30–46.

Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159-175.

Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 761–774.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

Teixeira, P. J., Carraça, E. V., Markland, D., Silva, M. N., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 1-30.

Uğraş, S., & Ozen, G. (2019). Examining teaching motivations of physical education teachers. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 4, 497–512.

Van den Berghe, L., Vansteenkiste, M., Cardon, G., Kirk, D., & Haerens, L. (2013). Research on self-determination in physical education: Key findings and proposals for future research. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(1), 97–121.

Van Doren, N., De Cocker, K., De Clerck, T., Vangilbergen, A., Vanderlinde, R., & Haerens, L. (2021). The relation between physical education teachers' (de-)motivating style, students' motivation, and physical activity: A multilevel approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7457.

Vasconcellos, D., Parker, P., Hilland, T., Cinelli, R., Owen, K. B., Kapsal, N., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Lonsdale, C. (2020). Self-determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1444–1469.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME250331006S

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804