PRIMA FACIE EXAMINATION OF JURISDICTION OF THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION – NOTION, INTERPRETATION AND THE ROLE IN ARBITRAL PRACTICE
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Cрпски)References
Antonietti, A. (2006), The 2006 Amandments to the ICSID Rules and Regulations and the Additional Facility Rules, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 2, 427–448.
Арбитражна правила Међународног центра за решавање инвестиционих спорова (2006).
Brown, C., Puig, S. (2011), The Power of ICSID Tribunals to Dismiss Proceedings Summarily: An Analysis of Rule 41(5) of The ICSID Arbitration Rules, University of Sydney Law School Legal Studies Reaearch Paper, 11/33, 1–33.
Douglas, Z. (2009), The International Law of Investment Claims, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ђундић, П. (2013), Пристанак државе на арбитражу са страним улагачем – модалитети пристанка, ограничења и меродавно право [Consent of the State to Arbtration with Foreign Investor – Modes of Consent, Restrictions and Applicable Law], Зборник радова Правног факултета у Новом Саду, 3, 359–375.
Конвенција о решавању инвестиционих спорова између држава и држављана других држава (1965), Службени лист СЦГ – Међународни уговори бр. 2 (2006).
Reinisch, A. (2011), How Narrow are Narrow Dispute Settlement Clauses in Investment Treaties?, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 1, 115–174.
Sheppard, A. (2008), The Jurisdictional Threshold of a Prima-Facie Case. У P. Muchlinski, F. Ortino и C. Schreuer, The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (стр. 933–961), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vandevelde, K. J. (2010), Bilateral Investmnent Treaties – History, Policy, and Interpretation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804