THE USE OF ARTWORKS IN MONEY LAUNDERING SCHEMES AND THE ROLE OF FREEPORTS

Milica Bošković, Nenad Putnik, Radojica Lazić

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME260119020B
First page
293
Last page
312

Abstract


The art market has increasingly been recognised as a sector vulnerable to money laundering and tax fraud due to its structural opacity, subjective valuation mechanisms, and historically limited regulatory oversight. In recent decades, these risks have been further intensified by the growing role of freeports, which have evolved from trade-facilitating customs zones into long-term storage facilities for high-value assets, particularly artworks. This paper examines the use of artworks as instruments of money laundering and analyses the role of freeports in enabling the concealment, transfer, and integration of illicit financial flows. Drawing on academic literature, legal scholarship, and institutional policy documents, the paper situates the analysis within broader theoretical frameworks of organised and financial crime. It identifies key mechanisms through which artworks are used in money laundering schemes, including valuation manipulation, private transactions, offshore ownership structures, and the use of artworks as financial assets. The paper further explores the historical development and legal nature of freeports, highlighting their transformation into spaces of regulatory opacity that may facilitate tax avoidance and money laundering. The analysis demonstrates that the misuse of artworks and freeports is not an isolated phenomenon but a systemic consequence of financialisation, regulatory fragmentation, and transnational capital mobility. While recent regulatory initiatives, particularly at the European level, have sought to address these risks, significant gaps remain with regard to transparency, beneficial ownership, and effective oversight. The paper concludes that combating money laundering and tax fraud in the art market and freeport environment requires a comprehensive and coordinated approach that extends beyond traditional financial regulation and integrates tax authorities, customs administrations, and law enforcement bodies.


Keywords

art market, money laundering, freeports, financial crime, tax fraud.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baranello, A. (2021). Money laundering and the art market: Closing the regulatory gap. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 24(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-01-2021-0002

Bošković, M. (2021). Women at Crime. Diplomacy and Security, No. 2/2021, година IV, vol. 4, pp. 27-237

Burman, R. W. (1948). Practical aspects of inventory and receivables financing. Law and Contemporary Problems, 13(4), 555–565. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1189927

Dagirmanjian, S. (2019). Laundering the art market: A proposal for regulating money laundering. Florida Journal of International Law, 31(2), 1–36.

EPRS. (2017). Freeports in the EU. European Parliamentary Research Service.

FATF. (2021). Money laundering and terrorist financing through the art and antiquities market. Financial Action Task Force.

Furman, J. M. (2023). Accent Delight International Ltd. et al. v. Sotheby’s et al., 18-CV-9011 (JMF), Opinion and Order. United States District Court, Southern District of New York.through

Helgadóttir, O. (2020). The new luxury freeports: Offshore storage, tax avoidance, and “invisible” art. Regulation & Governance, 14(3), 1–18.

Hix, S. (2018). Decentralised federalism: A new model for the European Union. In B. Martill & U. Staiger (Eds.), Brexit and beyond: Rethinking the futures of Europe (pp. xx–xx). London, UK: UCL Press.

INTERPOL. (2021). Assessment of crime against cultural property. INTERPOL.

Krstić, G. (2023). Combating illicit trafficking in cultural property. Crimen: Journal of Criminal Sciences, 14(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2301097

Mosna, A. (2022). Give art market regulation a chance. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 29(3), 304–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X221082509

Novković, N. (2025). Alignment of Serbia’s normative and institutional capacities with current international standards for the prevention of money laundering. Bezbednost, 2, 179–206. https://doi.org/10.5937/bezbednost2502179N

Saleeby, J. (2023). How free should a freeport be? Reducing money laundering risks in freeports. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(1), 85–101.

Schneider, F. (2013). The financial flows of transnational crime and tax fraud in OECD countries: What do we (not) know? OECD.

Schwarzkopf, S., & Backsell, A. (2020). The nomos of the freeport. Law and Critique, 31(2), 159–181.

Shelley, L. (2000). Transnational organized crime and seized assets. National Institute of Justice.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME260119020B

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804