POLICE PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN ENGLAND, WALES AND NORTHERN IRELAND: INTEGRATING TRUST, LEGITIMACY AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE

Vince Vári, Dragana Čvorović, Marija Popović Mančević

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME260218034V
First page
555
Last page
576

Abstract


This article reviews international scholarship on police performance measurement, emphasising the increasing centrality of public trust and police legitimacy in defining and operationalising effectiveness and efficiency. The authors contend that traditional output indicators, such as clearance rates, response times, and arrest or detention counts are insufficient to capture the full social value and should be supplemented by perceptual, process-quality, and procedural indicators. Drawing on empirical research regarding macro- and micro-level drivers of trust—including violent crime rates, democratic institutional context, and socio-demographic and attitudinal variables—the article demonstrates the practical significance of procedural justice for public acceptance of police decisions, even when outcomes are unfavourable for citizens. The analysis uses UK examples to illustrate institutional embedding of these concepts, focusing on the PEEL assessment framework in England and Wales and the accountability functions of Police and Crime Commissioners, while also incorporating Northern Ireland as a salient case where legitimacy- and confidence-oriented measurement has particular strategic importance for policing governance. The authors conclude that sustainable performance improvement depends on an integrated indicator system that renders both outcomes and the socially consequential side effects of policing visible through transparency, feedback mechanisms, and measurable legitimacy safeguards.


Keywords

police performance measurement, trust in policing, police legitimacy, procedural justice, democratic accountability.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anđelković, J., Vučetić, D. & Vukašinović-Radojićič, Z. (2024). Conceptual Issues of Public Officials Accountability: Research Conducted in Local Self-Government Units in the Republic of Serbia. TEME, XLVIII (3), 777−795. https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME240410044A.

Association of Police and Crime Commissioners (APCC) (n.d.). The role of Police and Crime Commissioners. https://www.apccs.police.uk/role-of-pcc/.

Bradford B., Jackson, J. (2010). Trust and Confidence in the Police: A Conceptual Review. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1684508.

Bradford, B., Jackson, J., & Stanko, E. A. (2009). Contact and confidence: Revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police. Policing and Society, 19(1), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460802457594.

Brunet, J. R. (2006). Measuring social equity performance in the criminal justice system. Paper presented at the Fifth Social Equity Leadership Conference, Omaha.

Chandek, M. S. (1999). Race, expectations, and evaluations of police performance: An empirical assessment. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 22(4), 675–695. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639519910293594.

Charbonneau, É., & Riccucci, N. M. (2008). Beyond the usual suspects: An Analysis of the Performance Measurement Literature on Social Equity Indicators in Policing. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(4), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR153-9576310405.

Cheurprakobkit, S. (2000). Police-citizen contact and police performance: Attitudinal differences between Hispanics and non-Hispanics. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(4), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(00)00042-8.

College of Policing. (2014). Code of ethics: A code of practice for the principles and standards of professional behavior for the policing profession of England and Wales. https://www.college.police.uk/What-we-do/Ethics/Documents/Code_of_Ethics.pdf

College of Policing. (2022). Race action plan: Improving Policing for Black people. https://www.npcc.police.uk/SysSiteAssets/media/downloads/our-work/race-action-plan/police-race-action-plan-improving-policing-for-black-people.pdf.

Collier, P. M. (2006). In search of purpose and priorities: Police performance indicators in England and Wales. Public Money & Management, 26(3), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00518.x.

Čvorović, D. ( 2022 ). Latent crime and police statistics – The role of sense of security in the law enforcement work. Crimen, XIII (3), 247–264. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-219X/2022/2217-219X2203247Q.pdf.

Feilzer, M. Y. (2009). Not fit for purpose! The (ab-)use of the British Crime Survey as a performance measure for individual police forces. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 3(2), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pap009.

Gianakis, G. A. (1994). Appraising the performance of “street-level bureaucrats”: The case of police patrol officers. American Review of Public Administration, 24(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409402400305.

Good Friday Agreement. (1998). The Belfast Agreement. UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-belfast-agreement.

Grizzle, G. A. (2002). Performance Measurement and Dysfunction: The Dark Side of Quantifying Work. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(4), 363–369.

Hanway, P., & Hambly, O. (2023). Public perceptions of policing: A review of research and literature. Home Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-perceptions-of-policing-a-review-of-research-and-literature/public-perceptions-of-policing-a-review-of-research-and-literature.

Hartley, J., Vo, Q., Beashel, J., Parker, S., Kahlil, L. & Sicilia, M. (2019). Leadership to create public value. Centre for Policing Research and Learning. https://university.open.ac.uk/centres/policing/research/leadership-management-and-organisation/305-leadership-create-public-value.

Hatry, H. P. (2006). Performance measurement: Getting results (2nd ed.). Urban Institute Press.

Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services. (2018). Value for money profiles. https://hmicfrs.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/publications/value-for-money-profiles/

Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services. (2022). PEEL: Police legitimacy 2022. https://hmicfrs.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/peel-assessments/.

Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services. (2023). PEEL assessment framework 2023–2025. https://hmicfrs.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/publications/peel-assessment-framework-2023-2025/.

Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services. (2024). Proposed policing inspection programme and framework 2025–29. https://hmicfrs.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/publication-html/proposed-policing-inspection-programme-and-framework-2025-29/.

Hillsborough Independent Panel. (2012). The report of the Hillsborough Independent Panel. UK Government. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/229038/0581.pdf.

Home Office. (2023). Draft community scrutiny framework: National guidance for community scrutiny panels. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/national-guidance-for-community-scrutiny-panels/draft-community-scrutiny-framework-national-guidance-for-community-scrutiny-panels-accessible-version.

Home Office. (2026). Police performance framework. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/police-performance-framework.

Horváth, O. (2025). The forensic significance of 3D reconstruction from the crime scene to the courtroom. In S. Kosztya, A. Fullár, H. Pamjav, D. Petrétei, Z. Szoldán, M. Teknős-Abonyi, & Z. Ujvári (Eds.), Géza Katona was born a hundred years ago: centenary volume (pp. 139–146). National Center for Expertise and Research.

Hurst, Y. G., & Frank, J. (2000). How kids view cops: The nature of juvenile attitudes toward the police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(3), 189–202.

Independent Commission on Policing for Northern Ireland. (1999). A new beginning: Policing in Northern Ireland (The Patten Report). UK Government. https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/issues/police/patten/patten99.pdf.

Independent Office for Police Conduct. (2024). Annual report and accounts 2023/24. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67a09c1d4731769befb0476a/_HC+707_+-+IOPC+Annual+Report+and+Accounts+2023-24.pdf.

Jackson, J. & Bradford, B. (2022). On the nature of Acquiescence to Police Authority: A Commentary on Hamm et al. (2022). Legal and Criminological Psychology, 27(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12217.

Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2010). What is trust and confidence in the police? Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(3), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paq020.

Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. R. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051–1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs032.

Jang, H., Joo, H.-J., & Zhao, J. S. (2010). Determinants of public confidence in police: An international perspective. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.11.008.

Li, J., Zhang, S., Sun, I. & Ho, A. (2024). Police legitimacy and procedural justice for children and youth: a scoping review of definitions, determinants, and consequences. Frontiers in Sociology, 9(24). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1409080.

Lee, S., Kwak, D. & Yoo, Y. (2025). Police legitimacy through procedural justice: Examining the dual mediating role of institutional trust and obligation to obey. Policing: An International Journal, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2024-0095.

Lippai, Z. (2024a): Security, Insurance and Services – Organizing the UEFA EURO 2020 European Football Championship in Hungary. Rendőrségi Tanulmányok (Police Studies) 7(1), 4-36. https://doi.org/10.53304/RT.2024.1.01.

Lippai Z. (2024b): Rethinking roles in ensuring security. National University of Public Service (NKE), NKE Doctoral School of Law Enforcement, 121-122.

Lister, S., & Rowe, M. (2015). Accountability of policing. Routledge.

Loader, I., & Mulcahy, A. (2003). Policing and the condition of England: Memory, politics and culture. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299066.001.0001

Macpherson, W. (1999). The Stephen Lawrence inquiry: Report of an investigation. Home Office.

Mawby, R. I. (1996). Comparative research of police practices in England, Germany, Poland, and Hungary. In Policing in Central and Eastern Europe: Comparing firsthand knowledge with experience from the West (pp. 473–485). https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/comparative-research-police-practices-england-germany-poland-and.

Mazerolle, L., Antrobus, E., Bennett, S., & Tyler, T. R. (2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51(1), 33–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00289.x.

Mazerolle, L., Sargeant, E., Cherney, A., & Bennett, S. (2014). Procedural justice and legitimacy in policing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04543-6.

Mijalković, S. & Popović Mančević, M. (2017). Radna motivacija policijskih službenika u lokalnoj zajednici, In D. Subošić (ed), Upravljanje policijskom organizacijom u sprečavanju i suzbijanju pretnji bezbednosti u Republici Srbiji (pp. 107−120). Beograd: Kriminalističko-policijska akademija.

Moore, M. H., & Braga, A. A. (2003a). The “bottom line” of policing: What citizens should value (and measure!) in police performance. Police Executive Research Forum.

Moore, M. H., & Braga, A. A. (2003b). Measuring and improving police performance: The lessons of Compstat and its progeny. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 26(3), 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510310489485.

Mulcahy, A. (2006). Policing Northern Ireland: Conflict, legitimacy and reform. Willan Publishing.

Murphy, K., Hinds, L., & Fleming, J. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for the police. Policing & Society, 18(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460802008660.

National Audit Office. (2015). Financial sustainability of police forces in England and Wales.

Nyitrai, E. (2025): Artificial intelligence in criminalistics: new dimensions of AI Copywriting. Belügyi Szemle, 73(SI1), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.38146/BSZ-AJIA.2025.v73.SI1.pp199-210.

Office for National Statistics. (2023). User guide to crime statistics for England and Wales: Measuring public confidence in the police. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/methodologies/userguidetocrimestatisticsforenglandandwales.

Office for National Statistics. (2024). Confidence in the local police: Ethnicity facts and figures. https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/crime-justice-and-the-law/policing/confidence-in-the-local-police/latest.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (n.d.). Assessment of the Hungarian measurement framework: Enhancing the public procurement performance measurement framework in Hungary. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/enhancing-the-public-procurement-performance-measurement-framework-in-hungary_afc1d91a-en/full-report/component-6.html.

Orr, M., & West, D. M. (2007). Citizen evaluations of local police: Personal experience or symbolic attitudes? Administration & Society, 38(6), 649–668. DOI: 10.1177/0095399706293989.

Pachon, H. P., & Lovrich, N. P. (1977). The consolidation of urban public services: A focus on the police. Public Administration Review, 37(6), 38–47.

Payne, B. K., & Gainey, R. R. (2007). Attitudes about the police and neighborhood safety in disadvantaged neighborhoods: The Influence of Criminal Victimization and Perceptions of a Drug Problem. Criminal Justice Review, 32(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016807300500.

Peacock, R. P. (2022). The generalizability of public judgments of procedural justice across police interaction and demographic variables. Journal of Criminal Justice, 82, Article 101999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101999.

Pérez-Vincent, S. M., & Puebla, M. (2024). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: Evidence from a vignette experiment in Central America. Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/procedural-justice-and-police-legitimacy-evidence-vignette-experiment-central-america.

Police (Northern Ireland) Act 2000, c. 32, §52. (2000). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/32/section/52.

Public Safety Canada. (2015). Measuring the performance of the police: The perspective of Canadian police board members. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/2015-r034/2015-r034-en.pdf.

RAND Europe. (2023). International approaches to police performance measurement. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2790-1.html.

Reisig, M. D., & Parks, R. B. (2000). Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: A hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly, 17(3). 575–629.

Reynolds, J. J., Estrada-Reynolds, V., & Nunez, N. (2018). Development and validation of the Attitudes Towards Police Legitimacy Scale. Law and Human Behavior, 42(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000281.

Shane, J. M. (2010). Performance management in police agencies: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 12(1), 6-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511011020575.

Shin, Doh Chull (1977): The quality of municipal service: Concept, measure, and results. Social Indicators Research, 4(1), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353131.

Stanko, E. A., & Bradford, B. (2009). Beyond measuring ‘how good a job’ police are doing: The MPS model of confidence in policing. Policing, 3(4), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pap047.

Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002.

Tyler, T. (2014). Legitimacy and Procedural Justice: A New Element of Police Leadership. Office of Justice Programs. https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/legitimacy-and-procedural-justice-new-element-police-leadership.

Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. Russell Sage Foundation.

Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A Relational Model of Authority in Groups. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 25, 115–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X.

UK Statistics Authority. (2025). National Statistician’s independent review of the measurement of public services productivity. https://uksa.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/publication/national-statisticians-independent-review-of-the-measurement-of-public-services-productivity/pages/14/.

Van Dijk, J. J. M. (2001). Attitudes of victims and repeat victims towards the police. In G. Farrell & K. Pease (Eds.), Repeat victimization. Criminal Justice Press.

Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2002). Perceptions of racial profiling: Race, class, and personal experience. Criminology, 40(2), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00962.x.

Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2005). Determinants of public satisfaction with the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611104271105.

Wolfe, S. E. (2011). The effect of low self-control on perceived police legitimacy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.10.006.

Worden, R. E. & McLean, S. J. (2018). Measuring, managing, and enhancing procedural justice in policing: Promise and pitfalls. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034166625.

Yesberg, J. A., Sargeant, E., Fenn, L., Murphy, K. & Madon, N. (2024). Fairness in policing: How does internal procedural justice translate to external procedural justice? Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paae126.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME260218034V

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
Print ISSN: 0353-7919
Online ISSN: 1820-7804